By chance, I'm just reading Dream Repairman, the autobiography of the film's editor. Alas, he doesn't mention alternate cuts or censor trouble or anything that would explain this. But that does add slight weight to the theory that there only was one cut and a typo as to running time has been repeated. Maybe somebody misheard 130 for 113 and wrote it down that way.
Although, any home video will be slightly shorter than the original cinema running time, won't it? Or did that only apply to VHS?