![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| Ask a Film Question Have a nostalgic or burning question? Somebody here might be able to clear your mind. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
DB7
is scavenging through life's very constant lulls
Administrator
|
Quote:
They now use a cultural points system and the factors above all count towards a films Britishness. Department for Culture Media and Sport - New Cultural Test For British Films |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
Just the heads of departments? Or everyone involved? Of all departments or just the major ones like director, cinematographer & designer? Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Third Man
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Category A Films where the cultural and financial impetus is from the UK and the majority of the personnel are British. Category B Majority UK Co-Productions. Films in which, though there are foreign partners, there is a UK cultural content and a significant amount of British finance and personnel. Category C Minority UK Co-Productions. Foreign (non US) films in which there is a small UK involvement in finance or personnel. Category D American films with a UK creative and/or minor financial involvement. Category D1 American financed or part finance films made in the UK. Most films have a British cultural content. Category D2 American films with some UK financial involvement. Simon |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
PaulPlowman
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
ukonscreen.com |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
The rules above are those used by The Encyclopedia of British Film by Brian McFarlane. Other people use the nationality of the director, the leading actors, the studio. The IMDb also uses the production company in a similar way to McFarlane. Similar, not exactly the same. The IMDb just looks at who provides the funding, the nationality of the production company, in the order of their involvement (how much funding they provide) Looking at those case given: Category A Films where the cultural and financial impetus is from the UK and the majority of the personnel are British. IMDb: Country=UK Category B Majority UK Co-Productions. Films in which, though there are foreign partners, there is a UK cultural content and a significant amount of British finance and personnel. IMDb: Country=UK/(other country/ies) in order of level of involvement Category C Minority UK Co-Productions. Foreign (non US) films in which there is a small UK involvement in finance or personnel. IMDb: Country=(other country/ies)/UK in order of level of involvement Category D American films with a UK creative and/or minor financial involvement. Category D1 IMDb: Country=US/UK in order of level of involvement American financed or part finance films made in the UK. Most films have a British cultural content. IMDb: Country=US/UK in order of level of involvement Category D2 American films with some UK financial involvement. IMDb: Country=US/UK in order of level of involvement Hardly any feature films are purely British (or any other nationality) these days. Most are made by collaboration between people from lots of different countries The IMDb classes The Big Lebowski as US/UK and it classes O Brother, Where Art Thou? as US/France/UK Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Third Man
has no status.
Senior Member
|
If they do then I think they are mistaken in doing so. Lets take for example Sidney Lumet who is an American, he directed The Hill (1965) and The Offence (1972) these films to me are British, the same goes for Peckinpah's Straw Dogs and would Night of the Demon (1957) be termed a French film because it was directed by Jacques Tourneur.
Simon |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
howard 65
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks | ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |