![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| Ask a Film Question Have a nostalgic or burning question? Somebody here might be able to clear your mind. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
MightyMcT
has no status.
Junior Member
|
That was my understanding too, but then I found all those press articles from the time of the actual shooting (and even before that, when names like Sean Connery, Paul Newman and Richard Burton were still considered for the main role!) and they *all* are referring to the film as "Dark of the Sun"...
So, apparently, "Dark of the Sun" was the title they were using right from the beginning (during both pre-production and shooting)... And the movie was later retitled "The Mercenaries". Hence my question. (By the way, I think the Wilbur Smith novel was retitled too, as according to various sources, it was originally titled "The Train from Katanga"...?) |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
asiamiles
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I was going to suggest it might have been retitled to avoid confusion with Sergio Corbucci's THE MERCENARY (which was retitled A PROFESSIONAL GUN in the UK) made the same year - and I believe both were distributed by MGM - but according to the IMDb it wasn't released in the US until 1970. It's still possible though, and also possible that THE MERCENARY was retitled to avoid people confusing it with THE MERCENARIES, something I'd never considered prior to this thread. Last edited by asiamiles; 16-09-2008 at 12:06 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
homeguard
has no status.
Senior Member
|
I know nothing of the film's title change having only ever seen it titled "Dark of The Sun", but as a film about the exploits of hired military personnel it was brilliant on so many levels.
The director, Jack Cardiff, got it just right and for me enhanced an already great book. The ineffectiveness of the United Nation's UNOC operation was so well highlighted right at the beginning of the film, although if Rod Taylor's character was supposed to represent Mike Hoare, the UN had already left when he was employed by Tshombe to rescue the European civilians from Stanleyville in 1964. But Rod Taylor's disdain of the Swedish UN Officer at the airport set up the rest of the film perfectly. Thirty countries sent troops to serve with the UN in the Congo between 1960 and 1963. At its height (1961) there were almost 20,000 in country. But they failed to control the rebel groups opposed to the Government. Mike Hoare managed to extract most of the Europeans, around 1,300, cut off by the Simbas with only 300 'mercenaries' and support from Belgian forces who were ready to leave the country. The film portrays the ethos of this military success beautifully and doesn't hesitate to depict the cruelty so prevalent in African 'bushfire' wars. Good luck with your researching. Regards, HG |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Mr Cosmo
is schizoid, no I'm not! Yes you are!!!
Senior Member
|
F Maurice Speed's Annual gives the UK released date as 17th March 1968 although you have to remember back then that films often opened in London before other places (e.g. it didn't open in Glasgow until 21 April 1968)
The version I saw on TCM looks like the version that was shown in cinemas. You have to remember back then that the BBFC were still fairly strong on cutting violence and sexual violence. A year later and they would allowed more, two and a half years later they would have let it go completely uncut. (The film was passed uncut on 19 January 1968, but MGM would have made their own cuts to get an X). |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
homeguard
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Regards, HG |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2009 BritMovie |