![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| British Films and Chat For movie polls, thoughts, and discussion.on British films and stars. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
batman
is little big horn
Chief Member
|
It's very difficult to compare the different virtues of a book or a film if one hasn't read the book. The possible reason for humdrum books being ignored is that no one has read them because they are humdrum and not worth reading. I enjoy the film The Towering Inferno but I have not read either of the two allegedly humdrum books that film is based on, therefore I do not feel able to make a comparison.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Windthrop
has no status.
Senior Member
|
I tend to divide fiction books into high-plot and low-plot narratives (am a former literature graduate). The former tend to be popular fiction (crime and thrillers) and the later tend towards 'serious' award winning literature. High-plots tend to translate more easily to the screen because they have shallower characterisation and less psychological insight. I admit I am generalising to some extent but there is some truth in it.
Last Orders Atonement both low-plotters which translated to the screen well Where Eagles Dare is a classic example of high-plot - in fact the screenplay came first. However in the case of Maclean's very few others made the transition to screen as well as WED - The Guns of Naverone did but is inferior to the book IMHO. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
batman
is little big horn
Chief Member
|
I like many of the films based on MacLean books, but few of them are equal to the books. WED is one, but as Windy said, the screenplay came first. The only one I think that improves on the the book is The Satan Bug. I found the book a bit plodding while the film fairly zips along.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
ProfMarcus
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
One example of a dull book turned into a classic film is Christiana Brand's Green For Danger. Of course, the presence of Alastair Sim would make the phone book filmable. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
AdrianTurner
has no status.
Senior Member
|
I would certainly put Jaws in the category of better-than-the-book. Benchley's novel had a great idea and some terrific scenes but if you remember it was also full of psycho-babble and a totally superfluous love interest between the sheriff's wife and the shark expert. Spielberg cut out all that rubbish and literally cut to the chase and made a much better thrill ride than the novel. And has anyone ever read Gone With the Wind, or Ben-Hur or Spartacus? On other hand, I would say that not one of the James Bond films are better than the novels.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
batman
is little big horn
Chief Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Tony Pendrey
is trying to remember where he buried his savings
Senior Member
|
A lot of Le Carre's works have been made into good films or TV series, but I wouldn't say any screen adaptations have been better than the book.
I recently read "Billion Dollar Brain" and I would say IMHO that the film is better. The book does not have that great climax on the ice sheet. (Nor the great atmospheric music)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |