Better than the book, worse than..... - Page 2 - Britmovie - British Film Forum

Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum
Home Page Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

 »   Britmovie - British Film Forum » Lobby » British Films and Chat

Notices

British Films and Chat For movie polls, thoughts, and discussion.on British films and stars.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2008, 12:19 PM
stevie boy is a fulham fanatic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coventry
Posts: 1,776
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Alan Badel & James Hayter both mentioned in this very interesting thread. Both very good espcially Badel who died far too early.

stevie boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 08:23 AM
Blanche Fury has no status.
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 44
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverwhistle View Post
I cannot think of a single case where the film is better than the book: as good as in the best cases, but never better. But there are far too many cases where the film is worse.
Far too sweeping a statement, surely. What about, for example, Kind Hearts and Coronets? I've never read the book it's based on (Israel Rank) but as it's one of the best films ever made and the book is as far as I know utterly forgotten, the film must be better than the book.

There must be hundreds of fine films based on humdrum books. This thread seems to be taking into account only classic books.
Blanche Fury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 09:08 AM
batman is little big horn
Chief Member
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,020
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blanche Fury View Post
There must be hundreds of fine films based on humdrum books. This thread seems to be taking into account only classic books.
It's very difficult to compare the different virtues of a book or a film if one hasn't read the book. The possible reason for humdrum books being ignored is that no one has read them because they are humdrum and not worth reading. I enjoy the film The Towering Inferno but I have not read either of the two allegedly humdrum books that film is based on, therefore I do not feel able to make a comparison.

"Boom boom a baby .... Banham Zoo .... Banana pants! Hahahaha"
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 09:15 AM
Windthrop has no status.
Senior Member
 
Windthrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Yorks
Posts: 5,654
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

I tend to divide fiction books into high-plot and low-plot narratives (am a former literature graduate). The former tend to be popular fiction (crime and thrillers) and the later tend towards 'serious' award winning literature. High-plots tend to translate more easily to the screen because they have shallower characterisation and less psychological insight. I admit I am generalising to some extent but there is some truth in it.

Last Orders
Atonement
both low-plotters which translated to the screen well

Where Eagles Dare is a classic example of high-plot - in fact the screenplay came first. However in the case of Maclean's very few others made the transition to screen as well as WED - The Guns of Naverone did but is inferior to the book IMHO.

Thats the joke that killed the Music Hall !
Windthrop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 09:21 AM
batman is little big horn
Chief Member
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,020
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

I like many of the films based on MacLean books, but few of them are equal to the books. WED is one, but as Windy said, the screenplay came first. The only one I think that improves on the the book is The Satan Bug. I found the book a bit plodding while the film fairly zips along.

"Boom boom a baby .... Banham Zoo .... Banana pants! Hahahaha"
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 10:05 AM
Here Hare Here has no status.
Member
 
Here Hare Here's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oxford
Posts: 33
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

I was hoping that the film of the Da Vinci Code would be better then the book, but no. Book dreadful, film, 10 times worse!!
Here Hare Here is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 10:09 AM
batman is little big horn
Chief Member
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,020
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Here Hare Here View Post
I was hoping that the film of the Da Vinci Code would be better then the book, but no. Book dreadful, film, 10 times worse!!
I haven't read the book but I enjoyed the film.

"Boom boom a baby .... Banham Zoo .... Banana pants! Hahahaha"
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 10:13 AM
stevie boy is a fulham fanatic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coventry
Posts: 1,776
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by batman View Post
I haven't read the book but I enjoyed the film.
I read the Da Vinci Code and then watched the film, verdict both crap
stevie boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 10:25 AM
batman is little big horn
Chief Member
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,020
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevie boy View Post
I read the Da Vinci Code and then watched the film, verdict both crap
Don't pull your punches there stevieboy!

"Boom boom a baby .... Banham Zoo .... Banana pants! Hahahaha"
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 10:42 AM
Windthrop has no status.
Senior Member
 
Windthrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Yorks
Posts: 5,654
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Touch of Evil is in a completely different league to the original novel Badge of Evil. Pulp fiction to art house with the magic of Orson.

Thats the joke that killed the Music Hall !
Windthrop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 01:15 PM
ProfMarcus has no status.
Senior Member
 
ProfMarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 305
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverwhistle View Post
Yes, and also compare the more faithful 1982 version with Alan Badel as Count Fosco.
I loved that series and would give several non-essential organs to have it on DVD. Badel was the definitive Fosco (even above Sidney Greenstreet).

One example of a dull book turned into a classic film is Christiana Brand's Green For Danger. Of course, the presence of Alastair Sim would make the phone book filmable.

. . . and new thumbscrews for me . . .
ProfMarcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 03:42 PM
AdrianTurner has no status.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Go-Between country
Posts: 124
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

I would certainly put Jaws in the category of better-than-the-book. Benchley's novel had a great idea and some terrific scenes but if you remember it was also full of psycho-babble and a totally superfluous love interest between the sheriff's wife and the shark expert. Spielberg cut out all that rubbish and literally cut to the chase and made a much better thrill ride than the novel. And has anyone ever read Gone With the Wind, or Ben-Hur or Spartacus? On other hand, I would say that not one of the James Bond films are better than the novels.
AdrianTurner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 04:26 PM
Sibella Holland has no status.
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

The Lady Vanishes - much better than the book by Ethel Lina White. It's called 'The Wheel Spins', but is poor compared to the film, and not that great compared to other 1930s crime novels.
Sibella Holland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 04:29 PM
batman is little big horn
Chief Member
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,020
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdrianTurner View Post
I would certainly put Jaws in the category of better-than-the-book. Benchley's novel had a great idea and some terrific scenes but if you remember it was also full of psycho-babble and a totally superfluous love interest between the sheriff's wife and the shark expert. Spielberg cut out all that rubbish and literally cut to the chase and made a much better thrill ride than the novel. And has anyone ever read Gone With the Wind, or Ben-Hur or Spartacus? On other hand, I would say that not one of the James Bond films are better than the novels.
Dr No, for the same reasons you say the film of Jaws is better than the book (which it is).

"Boom boom a baby .... Banham Zoo .... Banana pants! Hahahaha"
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 04:51 PM
Tony Pendrey is trying to remember where he buried his savings
Senior Member
 
Tony Pendrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sunny Southend
Posts: 455
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (2)
Default

A lot of Le Carre's works have been made into good films or TV series, but I wouldn't say any screen adaptations have been better than the book.

I recently read "Billion Dollar Brain" and I would say IMHO that the film is better.

The book does not have that great climax on the ice sheet. (Nor the great atmospheric music)

Ah Yes, the Soviet Union. All them wheatfields and ballet in the evenings
Tony Pendrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:17 PM.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie