Quote:
Originally Posted by penfold
He writes well, his heart is in the right place, and he gets his round in. What's not to like??
|
I think the problem with all tv film critics is that they feel the need to be 'entertaining' - and, no doubt, this is why the Beeb choose them in the first place. Surely Jonathan Ross didn't get the job because of his encyclopaedic knowledge of the history of cinema, but rather because someone at the BBC thinks that the public 'like' him (plus, of course, he has to do something for his 18 million quid).
Similarly, Matthew Sweet has created a niche for himself, I suspect based on his sleazefest book on Shepperton and including a slightly creepy relationship with retired forgotten silent actresses (a bit Sunset Boulevard ?). TV producers seem to like that sort of thing as opposed to someone who would simply introduce/present a programme in praise of films that deserve to be seen on their own merits. Many of us, I suspect, would gladly write articles on Donald Calthrop, Charters and Caldicott or Wally Patch if we could only get them published - and if this sounds a little like sour grapes, then I agree entirely.