![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| British Films and Chat For movie polls, thoughts, and discussion.on British films and stars. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
DB7
is blinkin freezin
Administrator
|
No it was from the narrator. Rather than the film the focus was on Mark's character and objectifying him as part of London's dirty raincoat brigade. It was part of a segment looking at the punters who frequented such screenings.
Winner shot some naturist films... those where the women are always playing volleyball blush |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
One of the (many) big academic debates about Peeping Tom is trying to work out exactly what sort of thrill Mark gets from his films. I think his just having a quick J. Arthur is too simplistic. Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
42ndStreetFreak
has no status.
Member
|
The narration/script on the CH5 show was MUCH better, more serious and respectful...
But the Ch4 doc was still pretty good. That is except for the TWAT of a narrator (and some of his moronic script) but it was still great to see these clips, see the old cinema's, the old posters and to hear from those involved. Some of the material is VERY similar (if not the same) as the recent CH5 series actually. Shame about that dick narrator though. 2nd part tonight........... |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
But they shouldn't have put Mark into that category. He was much more complex than that. Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Holland
has no status.
Member
|
In the CH4 programme on the monday night about the sex films they made reference to the British film industry going belly up in the late '60s which meant the just about only place young actors and actresses could get a film gig was in Confessions type films. Compared to say ten years previously this is quite a comedown.
You only have to look at the films listed by decade on Screenonline to see something had gone wrong by the 70's. So what happened? [ 07. February 2005, 15:30: Message edited by: Holland ] |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
42ndStreetFreak
has no status.
Member
|
I agree that more mainstream/family orientated movies were in decline...but the late 60's/70's still gave us some fine thrillers and were a GLORIOUS time for Horror/Exploitation films with THE finest brit Horror movies coming in the late 60's (Witchfinder General") and the 70's ("The Wicker Man")
It was at the tail end of the 70's into the 80's that it REALLY died a death. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
smudge
is back at work now, but it pays for the weekends!
Moderator
|
Even in the early 70s British Horror was in decline. Once The Exorcist came along, that was pretty much it.
The start of the 'blockbuster' movie hastened Britfilm's collapse, with flicks like JAWS and of course STAR WARS. But then, Hollywood may well have busted it's blocks - but WE made Superman fly !! SMUDGE |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |