X-Rated: The films that Shocked Britain - Britmovie - British Film Forum

Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum
Home Page Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

 »   Britmovie - British Film Forum » Lobby » British Films and Chat

Notices

British Films and Chat For movie polls, thoughts, and discussion.on British films and stars.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2004, 09:52 AM
  post #1
sanndevil has no status.
Senior Member
 
sanndevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Streatham SW2
Posts: 387
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default X-Rated: The films that Shocked Britain

Hi folks - did anyone DVD-R the above, broadcast on C5 at 23:10 last night?

I totally forgot to set my machine before hitting the sauce last night! doh

As usual, will trade with a title from my collection.

Much appreciated
Nigel

sanndevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2004, 01:30 PM
  post #2
DB7
DB7 is blinkin freezin
Administrator
 
DB7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Shrops
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,109
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (10)
Default

Sadly I didn't but it was no great shakes. Rather than 'X-rated' films it was a history of soft porn 1970-2000. (on CH5 - who'd have thought it :) )

There were chronological clips interspersed with talking heads from Robin Askwith on the Confessions films, David Sullivan on Mary Milligton. Then it went Stateside to focus on 9 1/2 Weeks, Basic Instinct, Boogie Nights and how sex started not to sell (Showgirls, Striptease) and Hollywood wanting fewer films to carry an 18 certificate. (just 10% now)

The final part was dedicated to the arthouse. Peter Greenaway popped up and there were a few clips from French films like the Biase Moi.
DB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2004, 02:15 PM
  post #3
David Challinor has no status.
Senior Member
 
David Challinor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reigate
Posts: 286
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

I did! Well, VERY INTERESTING chunks of it - there was a great Ken Russell story I'll do a thread on later today...and the Very Great Nic Roeg spoke about Don't Look Now, explaining the sex scene splendidly
David Challinor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 12:51 PM
  post #4
DB7
DB7 is blinkin freezin
Administrator
 
DB7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Shrops
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,109
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (10)
Default

Channel 4 went over similar ground in the documentary Blue Movies last night. Once again David Sullivan was wheeled out and a barrage of 'Confessions of a...' clips.

And Mr Crook would have loved Peeping Tom's Mark described as a "serial wan*er."
DB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 03:11 PM
  post #5
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,797
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
</div><div class='quotemain'>DB7:
Channel 4 went over similar ground in the documentary Blue Movies last night. Once again David Sullivan was wheeled out and a barrage of 'Confessions of a...' clips.

And Mr Crook would have loved Peeping Tom's Mark described as a "serial wan*er." [/b]
Who was that from, Michael Winner? I hear he was interviewed in that segment.

Something about pots & kettles springs to mind :)

Steve

Steve Crook

PaPAS
Steve Crook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 03:54 PM
  post #6
DB7
DB7 is blinkin freezin
Administrator
 
DB7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Shrops
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,109
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (10)
Default

No it was from the narrator. Rather than the film the focus was on Mark's character and objectifying him as part of London's dirty raincoat brigade. It was part of a segment looking at the punters who frequented such screenings.

Winner shot some naturist films... those where the women are always playing volleyball blush
DB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 06:18 PM
  post #7
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,797
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
</div><div class='quotemain'>DB7:
No it was from the narrator. Rather than the film the focus was on Mark's character and objectifying him as part of London's dirty raincoat brigade. It was part of a segment looking at the punters who frequented such screenings.

Winner shot some naturist films... those where the women are always playing volleyball blush [/b]
Which led to Naked as Nature Intended which led to Harrison Marks & Pamels Green which led to Peeping Tom. Yes, I see the connection although I'd guess that the narrator (or whoever wrote the narration) had never seen Peeping Tom. Mark never needed to go to a "dirty raincoat" screening in a cinema club. He had his own cinema club - and one that the other punters wouldn't like very much.

One of the (many) big academic debates about Peeping Tom is trying to work out exactly what sort of thrill Mark gets from his films.

I think his just having a quick J. Arthur is too simplistic.

Steve

Steve Crook

PaPAS
Steve Crook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 08:32 PM
  post #8
42ndStreetFreak has no status.
Member
 
42ndStreetFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 70
iTrader: (0)
Default

The narration/script on the CH5 show was MUCH better, more serious and respectful...
But the Ch4 doc was still pretty good.

That is except for the TWAT of a narrator (and some of his moronic script) but it was still great to see these clips, see the old cinema's, the old posters and to hear from those involved.

Some of the material is VERY similar (if not the same) as the recent CH5 series actually.

Shame about that dick narrator though.

2nd part tonight...........
42ndStreetFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2005, 03:49 PM
  post #9
Simon Bermuda has no status.
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 46
iTrader: (0)
Default

If memory serves, PEEPING TOM did contain an amusing nod to dirty-raincoatism in the shape of Miles Malleson's doddery old punter, discreetly purchasing what were euphemistically described as 'views'.
Simon Bermuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2005, 08:15 PM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,797
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
</div><div class='quotemain'>Simon Bermuda:
If memory serves, PEEPING TOM did contain an amusing nod to dirty-raincoatism in the shape of Miles Malleson's doddery old punter, discreetly purchasing what were euphemistically described as 'views'. [/b]
Your memory is quite correct Simon. It was made even more amusing having that part played by Miles Malleson who more usually played vicars and other respectable members of society.

But they shouldn't have put Mark into that category. He was much more complex than that.

Steve

Steve Crook

PaPAS
Steve Crook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2005, 07:40 PM
42ndStreetFreak has no status.
Member
 
42ndStreetFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 70
iTrader: (0)
Default

I missed the 2nd part. Any good?

The 3rd part on Paul Raymond was very interesting though and the 4th on "The Joy of Sex" was pretty good too.
42ndStreetFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2005, 02:31 PM
Holland has no status.
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 42
iTrader: (0)
Default

In the CH4 programme on the monday night about the sex films they made reference to the British film industry going belly up in the late '60s which meant the just about only place young actors and actresses could get a film gig was in Confessions type films. Compared to say ten years previously this is quite a comedown.

You only have to look at the films listed by decade on Screenonline to see something had gone wrong by the 70's.

So what happened?

[ 07. February 2005, 15:30: Message edited by: Holland ]
Holland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2005, 03:16 PM
42ndStreetFreak has no status.
Member
 
42ndStreetFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 70
iTrader: (0)
Default

I agree that more mainstream/family orientated movies were in decline...but the late 60's/70's still gave us some fine thrillers and were a GLORIOUS time for Horror/Exploitation films with THE finest brit Horror movies coming in the late 60's (Witchfinder General") and the 70's ("The Wicker Man")

It was at the tail end of the 70's into the 80's that it REALLY died a death.
42ndStreetFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2005, 03:32 PM
DB7
DB7 is blinkin freezin
Administrator
 
DB7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Shrops
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,109
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (10)
Default

Quote:
</div><div class='quotemain'>Holland:
So what happened? [/b]
Many studios we're financed by the US majors. When they pulled out or cut investment in the 70s most had to make staff redundant and turn to television for work.
DB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2005, 04:35 PM
smudge is back at work now, but it pays for the weekends!
Moderator
 
smudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wolverhampton
Posts: 3,469
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (11)
Default

Even in the early 70s British Horror was in decline. Once The Exorcist came along, that was pretty much it.

The start of the 'blockbuster' movie hastened Britfilm's collapse, with flicks like JAWS and of course STAR WARS.

But then, Hollywood may well have busted it's blocks - but WE made Superman fly !!

SMUDGE

Welcome to my house. Enter freely, and of your own will...
smudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:53 AM.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie