The 39 Steps (again!) - Page 2 - Britmovie - British Film Forum

Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum
Home Page Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

 »   Britmovie - British Film Forum » Lobby » British Films and Chat

Notices

British Films and Chat For movie polls, thoughts, and discussion.on British films and stars.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2005, 12:46 AM
Gibbie has no status.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 711
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hugo@Jun 9 2005, 02:13 PM
The Thirty-Nine Steps written in 1915 was the first in a series of five novels by John Buchan featuring the character Richard Hannay.
The others were Greenmantle (1916), Mr Standfast (1918), The Three Hostages (1924) and Island Of Sheep. I don't think that any of the others were filmed.
A few years ago Penguin Books brought out an ominbus edition containing all five but I don't know if it still available.
Folio Society has the collection:
http://www.foliosoc.co.uk/offers/det...OfferCode=5Z35

Gibbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 08:10 PM
Wetherby Pond has no status.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 227
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Steve Crook@Jun 9 2005, 11:53 PM
And of course they don't need to do it on location because everyone now acknowledges that CGI is just as good as reality. Add to that a couple of ZapKill Bazookoids for the hero to carry and that'll do. It doesn't really need a script, just lots of special effects and explosions.
Since Robert Towne is writing it as well, I think it's a reasonably safe bet that it will have a script - what with him having a pretty decent track record in that department.

True, his filmography isn't exactly wall-to-wall masterpieces, but Chinatown wasn't exactly the work of a semi-literate baboon.
Wetherby Pond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 09:24 PM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,676
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Wetherby Pond@Jun 13 2005, 09:10 PM
Since Robert Towne is writing it as well, I think it's a reasonably safe bet that it will have a script - what with him having a pretty decent track record in that department.

True, his filmography isn't exactly wall-to-wall masterpieces, but Chinatown wasn't exactly the work of a semi-literate baboon.
Chinatown was very good - but how much of the work of a good scriptwriter is allowed to finish up on screen nowadays? Even once the scriptwriter has been hired, once the script is written it's often handed over at the start of production and that's the end of the writers involvement. Everyone and their dog seem to be allowed to change it as much as they want. Not just the director but even the actors and producer are allowed to say how they think things should be portrayed.

Steve
Steve Crook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 09:33 PM
Wetherby Pond has no status.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 227
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Steve Crook@Jun 13 2005, 10:24 PM
Chinatown was very good - but how much of the work of a good scriptwriter is allowed to finish up on screen nowadays? Even once the scriptwriter has been hired, once the script is written it's often handed over at the start of production and that's the end of the writers involvement. Everyone and their dog seem to be allowed to change it as much as they want. Not just the director but even the actors and producer are allowed to say how they think things should be portrayed.
Well, Towne's also directing, which suggests he'll have at least some say in what ends up on the screen. He also had a fairly hefty input into Chinatown over and above writing it, not least because he was a bigger "star" than Roman Polanski at the time. Admittedly, Polanski changed the ending, but Towne agreed that it was for the better (which it was).

Incidentally, just to get back to your earlier comment:

Quote:
And of course they don't need to do it on location because everyone now acknowledges that CGI is just as good as reality.[
Whereas Alfred Hitchcock would never have dreamt of resorting to studio or SFX trickery of any kind. Or Michael Powell. Good lord, no - it's hard to think of more fanatical sticklers for location-shot realism.

(In all seriousness, wouldn't both of them have utterly adored CGI? And been amongst the first to make really creative use of it?)
Wetherby Pond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 10:00 PM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,676
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Wetherby Pond@Jun 13 2005, 10:33 PM
Well, Towne's also directing, which suggests he'll have at least some say in what ends up on the screen. He also had a fairly hefty input into Chinatown over and above writing it, not least because he was a bigger "star" than Roman Polanski at the time. Admittedly, Polanski changed the ending, but Towne agreed that it was for the better (which it was).
Being a director does give you quite a lot more, but not total, creative control in modern Hollywoodland.

Steve
Steve Crook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 10:03 PM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,676
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Wetherby Pond@Jun 13 2005, 10:33 PM
Incidentally, just to get back to your earlier comment:
Whereas Alfred Hitchcock would never have dreamt of resorting to studio or SFX trickery of any kind. Or Michael Powell. Good lord, no - it's hard to think of more fanatical sticklers for location-shot realism.

(In all seriousness, wouldn't both of them have utterly adored CGI? And been amongst the first to make really creative use of it?)
Of course they would have loved it and made good use of it. Powell's films are full of special effects, often the most advanced available. But the key is in the phrases "make really creative use of it" and "made good use of it". Not just chucked it in because it was possible to do or cheaper than doing something for real.

Steve
Steve Crook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 10:21 PM
Wetherby Pond has no status.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 227
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Steve Crook@Jun 13 2005, 11:00 PM
Being a director does give you quite a lot more, but not total, creative control in modern Hollywoodland.
But Hitchcock himself didn't get total control until 1948, when he became his own producer - and even then he had to fight numerous battles (even to the extent of personally funding Psycho after he couldn't get a studio to back it - in retrospect the most lucrative decision he ever made).
Wetherby Pond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2005, 12:23 AM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,676
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Wetherby Pond@Jun 13 2005, 11:21 PM
But Hitchcock himself didn't get total control until 1948, when he became his own producer - and even then he had to fight numerous battles (even to the extent of personally funding Psycho after he couldn't get a studio to back it - in retrospect the most lucrative decision he ever made)
That's why P&P had that joint credit of Written, Produced and Directed by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, so that they could retain complete control over their films. They had a very privileged position under Rank where they were allowed to do just about whatever they liked, as long as their films continued to be successful, similar but slightly less so with Korda.

Martin Scorsese once described The Archers as "Experimental film-makers working inside a totally commercial system."

Just look at that heyday of the 6 feature films made from 1943-48 or even the 12 feature films made from 1941-51, it's hard to find any other film-makers that have ever been given that amount of freedom.

Steve
Steve Crook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-06-2005, 07:22 AM
Jim
Jim has no status.
Senior Member
 
Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: LEICESTER, ENGLAND
Posts: 825
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Rob Compton@Jun 9 2005, 01:02 PM
Wasn't the bridge in the 1930's version the Forth Railway Bridge?

Couple of other comments:

The 39 steps being a spy ring was a device used by Hitchcock's scriptwriters.

I agree that the Buchan novel is well worth reading - the same cannot be said, I am afraid, of the sequel Hannay book (or books? I'm at work at present and can't check how many or their titles
I still think the Hitchcock version is by far the best.

rgds
Rob
I'm reading a JB novel at the moment called 'Courts of the Morning' set in South America. My wife bought it but felt she couldn't continue because it was written in a style that is of it's time, (no PC) - me, on the other hand, love it!!! More power to JB (RIP).

Good morning boys.
Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-06-2005, 08:22 AM
samkydd has no status.
Senior Member
 
samkydd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Stackton Tressle
Posts: 2,463
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Steve Crook@Jun 9 2005, 10:53 PM
And of course they don't need to do it on location because everyone now acknowledges that CGI is just as good as reality. Add to that a couple of ZapKill Bazookoids for the hero to carry and that'll do. It doesn't really need a script, just lots of special effects and explosions.

Steve
And at the same time they'll make a sequel called the 42 Steps: Don't Take The Elevator and McDonalds will give away little plastic Zeke Harleys with every Happy Meal! Is there anybody in the film industry with any wit and imagination any more?

"...the chairman of Littlewoods stores made a Keynote speech!"
samkydd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-06-2005, 09:40 AM
Wetherby Pond has no status.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 227
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Steve Crook@Jun 14 2005, 01:23 AM
Martin Scorsese once described The Archers as "Experimental film-makers working inside a totally commercial system."

Just look at that heyday of the 6 feature films made from 1943-48 or even the 12 feature films made from 1941-51, it's hard to find any other film-makers that have ever been given that amount of freedom.
There are more than one might think - Stanley Kubrick and Clint Eastwood had similarly luxurious deals with Warner Bros, Woody Allen had more or less total creative freedom throughout the 1970s and 1980s for United Artists/Orion, even to the point of shooting several films in black and white (and distributing Manhattan on letterboxed video in the 1980s, when 99.9% of releases were pan-and-scan). More recently, the Coen Brothers have wangled a similar situation with the Universal-backed Working Title, Merchant Ivory had a deal with Miramax and Jim Jarmusch has an arrangement with JVC - in all cases they were either their own producers or they worked with very long-term partners who could be relied on not to interfere.

As with Powell & Pressburger, though, such deals were generally contingent on box-office income - not blockbuster level, but certainly enough to pay the bills, which is why Eastwood made Dirty Harry V between the much more commercially challenging Bird and Unforgiven.
Wetherby Pond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-06-2005, 02:05 PM
Merton Park has no status.
Senior Member
 
Merton Park's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 384
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

I loved the Kenneth More version when I first saw it, a real schoolboy's adventure yarn and have seen it many times since. Still love it. It's got a kind of Pinewood glow to it.

Not being a great lover of English 1930's films, usually slow and too dated for me, I watched the original Hitchcock version with amazement that it was completely different from most other films of the era. It had pace, a great cast and was way ahead of its time. Robert Donat was brilliant as Hannay and all round a tremendous film.

The shots of mid 30's London were good, and I was suprised to find that the murder took place in a block of flats I used to live in, just up the road from Broadcasting House.

Never much liked the 1970's version.
Merton Park is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2005, 10:36 PM
Hugo has no status.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 429
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

For anyone who may be interested, the 1988 Thames TV seies HANNAY starring Robert Powell as John Buchan's Richard Hannay is being repeated on ITV3 on Thursdays at 8.00pm starting tomorrow (30 June)
Hugo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-06-2005, 08:10 AM
Jim
Jim has no status.
Senior Member
 
Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: LEICESTER, ENGLAND
Posts: 825
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hugo@Jun 29 2005, 10:36 PM
For anyone who may be interested, the 1988 Thames TV seies HANNAY starring Robert Powell as John Buchan's Richard Hannay is being repeated on ITV3 on Thursdays at 8.00pm starting tomorrow (30 June)
Yep! Now that the 'Biederbeck' series has finished I shall watch 'Hanney' - if only I could get the damned video to record 'Freeview'!!!

I have the 1st 39 Steps and will try to get the other 2. I am fond of them all, and for differing reasons. Kenneth Moore's version was not available when last I tried Amazon; Sendit, etc. But I'll keep looking.

Good morning boys.
Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-06-2005, 08:15 AM
Jim
Jim has no status.
Senior Member
 
Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: LEICESTER, ENGLAND
Posts: 825
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hugo@Jun 29 2005, 10:36 PM
For anyone who may be interested, the 1988 Thames TV seies HANNAY starring Robert Powell as John Buchan's Richard Hannay is being repeated on ITV3 on Thursdays at 8.00pm starting tomorrow (30 June)
Yep! Now that the 'Biederbeck' series has finished I shall watch 'Hanney' - if only I could get the damned video to record 'Freeview'!!!

I have the 1st 39 Steps and will try to get the other 2. I am fond of them all, and for differing reasons. Kenneth Moore's version was not available when last I tried Amazon; Sendit, etc. But I'll keep looking.

Good morning boys.
Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
alfred hitchcock, the 39 steps


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:43 PM.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie