![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| British Films and Chat For movie polls, thoughts, and discussion.on British films and stars. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cheeky Bob
has no status.
Senior Member
|
I was doing some research for another thread when I stumbled across this - I've only glanced at it so far, but it looks pretty impressive.
Essentially, it's an online interactive video guide to Ealing's output (not just the comedies), presented by Jonathan Ross - and as far as I can see there are no viewing restrictions aside from connection speed. Apologies if this has already been mentioned, but I couldn't find a reference. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
spinalman
has no status.
Senior Member
|
OK, I'll help. You first though. What did you think of them, what is the thrust of your findings for each? Is there a trend -as the directors and screenplays were from different talent? and what about man in the White Suit that sits uncomfortably in the selection. Can you also clarify the question please?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Jmills88
has no status.
Junior Member
|
Ok, my view is that the post war comedies show a rebellious and cool criminal, but to keep in with regulations at the time showing the success of criminals would have been frowned upon so most show the eventual downfall, giving a sort of 'crime doesnt pay' message. I like the ambiguity that Kind Hearts ends on as well, but again the films portrays Louis as successful as a result of his crime. Can i have your views now. Please?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
spinalman
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Hi JMills88, I think that is a significant theme -that they don't succeed, but not unique -echoed in the many subsequent films (League of gentlemen, Italian Job, Wrong Arm of the Law, ). The criminals are often everymen, endearing, bumbling and sympathetic (continued in Passport to Pimilico) - contrast those with slightly earlier criminal portrayals in Ealing's Hue and Cry. With the exception of KH the crimes are victimless, against institutions- perhaps even fair game. One could argue the D'Ascoygne family in KH were also portrayed as "institutional" and deserving of their fate. Is that stance a post war thing? -tapping into the feeling of individuals against repression, a restricted state, making best of opportunities presented to them. The Sid James character in LHM is curious - he's a real criminal (as opposed to the Holloway and Guinness amateurs) yet is still portrayed as a bloke trying to make a honest living stealing stuff. In Hue and Cry the "Mr Big' of the crime caper is played by Jack Warner, and is genuinely a nasty piece of work... he didn't get typecast, and seemed to play Policeman from then on! Man in the White Suit is a strange choice...the only crime I see is the mob attacking our hero when their jobs are threatened. Whisky Galore is indeed a more consistent choice, or Passport to Pimlico. Last edited by spinalman; 30-11-2006 at 09:56 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Carmel
has no status.
Senior Member
|
I found that in the films you mention is that they made crime look great and adventurous and did not portray what crime really was in those days hard, rough and not always with reward. Simular to today but todays crime films tend to show you the hard ways that crime is dealt with and with more blood and gore where as in the 40's and 50's the policemen where always portrayed sweet and nice and homely same as the criminals where today they are portrayed hard and cold.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Tags | ![]() |
| ealing, ealing studios |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |