Brief Encounter - Passion and repression - Page 2 - Britmovie - British Film Forum

Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum
Home Page Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

 »   Britmovie - British Film Forum » Lobby » British Films and Chat

Notices

British Films and Chat For movie polls, thoughts, and discussion.on British films and stars.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17-05-2007, 09:13 AM
Moor Larkin is passing the time
Senior Member
 
Moor Larkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North West Frontier
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by batman View Post
Are you saying that, because a tender and beautifully written love story may have been about two men it would have been garbage, but because it was changed to a man and a woman it suddenly becomes a masterpiece?
I do think the tragedy of the actual film is of a somewhat different ilk to what the 'original' would have been. The fact is that there was little to stop Laura and Alec from consummating their relationship other than their own ethics. A homosexual affair would have had an entirely different dynamic perhaps redolent more of external repression rather than the repression which emanates from within a person..... although I can see there would have been some cross-over.



[code]http://www.flickr.com/photos/29487363@N02/sets/72157606700675506/code]
Moor Larkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 09:41 AM
batman is little big horn
Chief Member
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,076
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moor Larkin View Post
I do think the tragedy of the actual film is of a somewhat different ilk to what the 'original' would have been. The fact is that there was little to stop Laura and Alec from consummating their relationship other than their own ethics. A homosexual affair would have had an entirely different dynamic perhaps redolent more of external repression rather than the repression which emanates from within a person..... although I can see there would have been some cross-over.

I agree. The dynamic would have been entirely different, expecially with the shadow of the law hanging over them. However, for me the great joy of the film (apart from the wonderful depiction of a world long gone) are the wonderfully real scenes of intimacy between Alec and Laura, the dialogue that passes between could certainly have crossed over to a different relationship. It is a film which provokes an emotional response whichever character you empathise with. As a happily married man I can empathise with Freddie, but having experienced 'lost' love as a younger man I can also see how heartbreaking the situation is for Alec and Laura. Whatever your point of view, this is a wonderful film.

Bats.

"Boom boom a baby .... Banham Zoo .... Banana pants! Hahahaha"
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 02:23 PM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,796
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Was it written with the intention that the characters were gay? I don't think so. But if anyone knows any different then please enlighten us.

In his 1993 BFI book on the film, Richard Dyer notes that due to the rise of homosexual law reform, gay men also viewed the plight of the characters as comparable to their own social constraint in the formation and maintenance of relationships. In Straight Acting: Popular Gay Drama from Wilde to Rattigan, Sean O'Connor considers the film to be an 'allegorical representation of forbidden love' informed by Noel Coward's experiences as a closeted homosexual (p. 157).

But neither of them are suggesting that the characters as written by Coward were meant to be gay

Steve
Steve Crook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 04:17 PM
Hugo Fitch has no status.
Senior Member
 
Hugo Fitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Birkenhead
Posts: 107
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

One of the films which Alec amd Laura go to see is called "Flames of Passion"- will that do for the passion bit ? More seriously when Dolly says "one has one's roots. We are British after all " she speaks for her generation in the last summer before the war. Masterful as it is, I think it is a period piece. The repression is of the age not the characters and that is why, IMHO, "Falling in Love" although exquisitely acted by de Niro and Streep ultimately does not work.
Hugo Fitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 04:38 PM
dylan has no status.
Moderator
 
dylan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Posts: 543
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Crook View Post
Was it written with the intention that the characters were gay? I don't think so. But if anyone knows any different then please enlighten us.

In his 1993 BFI book on the film, Richard Dyer notes that due to the rise of homosexual law reform, gay men also viewed the plight of the characters as comparable to their own social constraint in the formation and maintenance of relationships. In Straight Acting: Popular Gay Drama from Wilde to Rattigan, Sean O'Connor considers the film to be an 'allegorical representation of forbidden love' informed by Noel Coward's experiences as a closeted homosexual (p. 157).

But neither of them are suggesting that the characters as written by Coward were meant to be gay

Steve
French critics assumed the Howard character was gay because of his inability to have a full sexual relationship with a woman and he was living with Valentine Dyall.

D
dylan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 05:46 PM
batman is little big horn
Chief Member
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,076
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Crook View Post
Was it written with the intention that the characters were gay? I don't think so. But if anyone knows any different then please enlighten us.

In his 1993 BFI book on the film, Richard Dyer notes that due to the rise of homosexual law reform, gay men also viewed the plight of the characters as comparable to their own social constraint in the formation and maintenance of relationships. In Straight Acting: Popular Gay Drama from Wilde to Rattigan, Sean O'Connor considers the film to be an 'allegorical representation of forbidden love' informed by Noel Coward's experiences as a closeted homosexual (p. 157).

But neither of them are suggesting that the characters as written by Coward were meant to be gay

Steve
I read about Coward's original ideas for the story in a book about gay and lesbian cinema (I can't remember the book's title though) many years ago. The author had done a great deal of research into this and had, according to the book, spoken with some of Coward's friends and collaborators who were still alive at the time. The book also featured interesting sketches of Anton Walbrook and other gay actors and a piece on Asquith's The Young Lovers.

Bats.

"Boom boom a baby .... Banham Zoo .... Banana pants! Hahahaha"
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 07:52 PM
mel walton has no status.
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 82
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Hi Bats,
Are you saying that, because a tender and beautifully written love story may have been about two men it would have been garbage, but because it was changed to a man and a woman it suddenly becomes a masterpiece?
No, it didn't suddenly become, it took a lot of great work by Lean, Johnson and Coward, Ok, the word 'garbage' was extreme but the idea of that great movie being about homosexuals makes me shudder. Sorry, if I offended anyone; that's my opinion. As the guy said, 'Difference of opinion is what makes horse racing'

Also, are you saying that Coward was able to create a 'stroke of genius' despite his homosexuality?
It does sound that way but that wasn't my intention, The idea of a homosexual writing about such had come up and I thought, I was saying something good about the man who, certainly, deserves credit for his work.

Coward was able to create that masterpiece primarily because he had a real insight into the problems that 'illicit' relationships face, and it was these insights which helped create such a wonderful film.
This part lost me; ok, I'm dense but I don't understand it.
I think, I've said enough so I'll quit before I get too far behind.
regards mel

Bats.
mel walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 08:19 PM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,796
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by batman View Post
I read about Coward's original ideas for the story in a book about gay and lesbian cinema (I can't remember the book's title though) many years ago. The author had done a great deal of research into this and had, according to the book, spoken with some of Coward's friends and collaborators who were still alive at the time. The book also featured interesting sketches of Anton Walbrook and other gay actors and a piece on Asquith's The Young Lovers.

Bats.
There's quite an industry in "Queering" films (their term) where they "reclaim" films that don't obviously have any links to homosexuality. A lot of the "research" done by these authors is quite frankly of rather dubious quality.

If you do remember where you read it I'd be interested to know the details. As I said, there are a lot of other references that contradict this

Steve
Steve Crook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 08:29 PM
penfold is ready for hibernation
Moderator
 
penfold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 4,354
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dylan View Post
French critics assumed the Howard character was gay because of his inability to have a full sexual relationship with a woman and he was living with Valentine Dyall.

D
It was also assumed in France that he must have truly adored Celia Johnson, as no Frenchman would have been seen dead talking to a woman with that awful hat otherwise....

Bit of a Bay Window, what??
penfold is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 08:37 PM
batman is little big horn
Chief Member
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,076
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Crook View Post
There's quite an industry in "Queering" films (their term) where they "reclaim" films that don't obviously have any links to homosexuality. A lot of the "research" done by these authors is quite frankly of rather dubious quality.

If you do remember where you read it I'd be interested to know the details. As I said, there are a lot of other references that contradict this

Steve
That's very true Steve, and perhaps I have relied too much on that book. I think I may have passed it on to a friend of mine. I'll check and find out if she's still got it.

Bats.

"Boom boom a baby .... Banham Zoo .... Banana pants! Hahahaha"
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 08:41 PM
batman is little big horn
Chief Member
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,076
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mel walton View Post
Hi Bats,
Are you saying that, because a tender and beautifully written love story may have been about two men it would have been garbage, but because it was changed to a man and a woman it suddenly becomes a masterpiece?
No, it didn't suddenly become, it took a lot of great work by Lean, Johnson and Coward, Ok, the word 'garbage' was extreme but the idea of that great movie being about homosexuals makes me shudder. Sorry, if I offended anyone; that's my opinion. As the guy said, 'Difference of opinion is what makes horse racing'

Also, are you saying that Coward was able to create a 'stroke of genius' despite his homosexuality?
It does sound that way but that wasn't my intention, The idea of a homosexual writing about such had come up and I thought, I was saying something good about the man who, certainly, deserves credit for his work.

Coward was able to create that masterpiece primarily because he had a real insight into the problems that 'illicit' relationships face, and it was these insights which helped create such a wonderful film.
This part lost me; ok, I'm dense but I don't understand it.
I think, I've said enough so I'll quit before I get too far behind.
regards mel

Bats.
Hi Mel

I wasn't offended by what you said, I just wanted to be sure I properly understood what you were trying to say. This has been an interesting thread and I have learned some things about the film I didn't know before and had some of my own perceptions challenged.

Bats.

"Boom boom a baby .... Banham Zoo .... Banana pants! Hahahaha"

Last edited by batman; 17-05-2007 at 08:44 PM..
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 08:42 PM
batman is little big horn
Chief Member
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,076
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by penfold View Post
It was also assumed in France that he must have truly adored Celia Johnson, as no Frenchman would have been seen dead talking to a woman with that awful hat otherwise....

Nice one Penfold ....


Bats.

"Boom boom a baby .... Banham Zoo .... Banana pants! Hahahaha"
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 08:48 PM
batman is little big horn
Chief Member
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,076
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Crook View Post
There's quite an industry in "Queering" films (their term) where they "reclaim" films that don't obviously have any links to homosexuality. A lot of the "research" done by these authors is quite frankly of rather dubious quality.

If you do remember where you read it I'd be interested to know the details. As I said, there are a lot of other references that contradict this

Steve
I just remembered a tv prog about 'queering' films that was on a few years ago ... the highlight for me was the 'Ben Hur' section, in particular how the director allegedly told Stephen Boyd to play Messala as if he was madly in love with Ben Hur. The next time I watched the film I couldn't but interpret Messala's motivations in that way .... the power of suggestion in action!

Bats.

"Boom boom a baby .... Banham Zoo .... Banana pants! Hahahaha"
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 09:15 PM
mel walton has no status.
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 82
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Hi Penfold,
It was also assumed in France that he must have truly adored Celia Johnson, as no Frenchman would have been seen dead talking to a woman with that awful hat otherwise....
Good for you. We needed a good laugh. regards, mel
mel walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 09:23 PM
mel walton has no status.
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 82
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Hi Bats,
This has been an interesting thread and I have learned some things about the film I didn't know before
Amen! I read posts that were 3 yrs old that I hadn't seen before. It, certainly, was interesting. I think we all agree, it was a great movie.
regards, mel
mel walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
brief encounter, david lean


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06 PM.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie