![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| British Television Discussion of British television past and present. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
smudge
is a free man, not a number!
Moderator
|
Quote:
I hope Beeb satellite don't tinker too much with the promised season of ALMOST HUMAN after the excellent performance by all three principals (AR as the ghost girl...) in the pilot. The lad who played the werewolf (sorry, I forget his name) will also be a performer to keep an eye on too, methinks. Anyway - back to the so-called drama of Finchley. Why do modern writers insist on putting 'knowing' and well signposted 'comic asides' in their writing - such as the Mark Thatcher joke? Can nobody write subtle staire anymore - or do they just think that modern audiences are too 'dumbed down' to understand it? These elements (often picked out in advance by reviewers) hit the viewer over the head and are more often than not incredibly jarring and groanworthy. Andrea Riseborough may not have done a 'Julie Walters' in the way she played the character, but the outcome was rendered just as awful by the writer's crashing gags... Smudge |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
![]() It was a drama not a satire, and a drama about the life of a person without a sense of humour (she had to be told how to tell a joke and often got it wrong) could do with something to lighten it. Were there many other gags apart from the two about Mark? I haven't seen the full thing yet. As for them being signposted by reviewers, that's hardly the fault of the writer of the drama. Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
smudge
is a free man, not a number!
Moderator
|
There was that bit about young Carol reading up on life in the jungle - to tie in with her winning that awful Ant & Dec celeb show...
It wasn't billed as a comedy either! I suppose I was just hoping - after Walters' piece of nonsense on Whitehouse - for some straight drama. I'd have thought that the subject leant itself to a straight approach, but never mind. I am obviously out of step with the modern approach to viewing. Is straight drama a thing of the past? Does modern drama always have to have some other underlying element to it like THE BILL (Soap) or this sort of drama with the overt comedy elements? And please, let's not have someone tell me about the use of comedy in Shakespeare and if it's good enough for him, it's good enough for anybody. I just think it's a shame to build a decent cast round a serious story and not be able to show events and people as they really were. Smudge |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
Maggie Thatcher - Milk Snatcher ![]() Or when she dances with Ted Heath and says "You lead - I'll follow". I really don't see what's wrong with putting a few gags into a drama. It was light hearted but it was far from being a laugh a minute. And the gags would have just raised knowing smiles, certainly not belly-laughs. It wasn't meant to be a documentary of exactly everything that happened in her early years. I doubt if that really had as many laughs or smiles. But it was subtitled "How Margaret might have done it". Presumably with an emphasis on the "might" I thought it was well written, well balanced and very well staged and performed. Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
rskershaw
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
'Fantabulosa' and the other four "dramas" on H.Corbett & Brambell, Hancock, Howerd and Green were in a similar vein, though they did contain pathos. The Whitehouse drama was essentially a skit on her life and prudishness (and full of anachronisms). For this reason I assumed the Thatcher drama would be the same so I didn't watch it. I did see a repeat of 'The Falklands Play' earlier in the week. Though I didn't necessarily agree with its political stance, at least it was a serious drama. Last edited by rskershaw; 14-06-2008 at 01:26 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
CaptainWaggett
is gloomy no more
Senior Member
|
Quote:
No! Greg Kinnear? I think you mean Rory 'Son of Roy' Kinnear, who is being groomed by Nicholas Hytner to take over the role of 'British's Greatest Living Actor' (he's being lined up for Hamlet at the NT next year) |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Geoffers
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I really enjoyed the programme and thought the references to future events re the milk, Mark etc. were fine - not overdone. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
penfold
is feeling moderate again...
Moderator
|
The same way so many of those parasites get theirs...waited for his father to die. Thatch Jr.'s knighthood is a baronetcy, an inherited knighthood, originally given to Denis...one of the last so honoured, I believe. Archer probably got his peerage from knowing where a few bodies are buried....
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks | ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |