Sorry, Steve, but I have to defend myself.
Why you [bruiser15] are concentrating on the cruelty to animals aspect is beyond me. That was in a separate post, in relation to Straight on Till Morning. Last night's response to yourself and Captain Waggett was about something totally different, which appears to have gone over your heads.
Again, my point was that someone I used to be on very friendly terms with in the early stages of my time here has, along with the others I mentioned, NOT been so friendly for quite some time (did you not read that bit?) I'm just curious to know why.
The most significant thing in this, bruiser, and the reason for the wagging finger to the aptly-named Captain Waggett is the time it took for the second post to appear. Have you looked at that three times as well? I submitted the thread at 3.49PM, and finished editing three minutes later.
The Captain posted at 3.57, and couldn't possibly have paid much/any attention to what I'd done (which took a lot of effort, as stated), the response being that immediate, leading me to think all that was read was the thread title. An observation based on past history (see below) and the reason I used the word "disrespectful". But you seem to be under the misguided impression that it was a reply to my post:
Really? I can't imagine there was time as she (I still keep thinking it's a bloke) bypassed that, pdq, and went straight ahead with her own example, which I have seen, long ago. Whether it's because my post was too long I don't know but it is so evident that she didn't read it.The Captain was just showing via a bit of compare and contrast how it's fate linked with that of poor Tinker
This is ultimately between me and The Captain, who claims to be "baffled" but may understand why I've felt "rebuffed", to use your expression, as it's happened a few times. The most memorable, from my point of view, was at the http://www.britmovie.co.uk/forums/as...r-maddern.html thread, which I revived 16 months after the last contribution. If you'd care to look at the times posts 7 and 8 were posted you will see that my two-page upload appeared at 6.40PM and Captain Waggett's 'response' was at 6.44.
This again shows that my effort was not only unappreciated but somewhat resented. "Why bother with Cornershop's TVTimes article when you can read Victor Maddern's obituary in The Times" is the way I interpreted it, less than five minutes after I posted. And it's been a similar story here. It can't be coincidence.
Sorry it's turned out this way, Captain. And we used to get on so well! If it's because I'm even more serious and sensitive than I was before I joined then I apologise. Let's get back to animals, shall we? At least we're on the same wavelength with that.


Reply With Quote
