Watchdog criticises gun movie ads - Britmovie - British Film Forum
Britmovie - British Film Forum

Go Back   Britmovie - British Film Forum Cinema General Film Chat

Notices

General Film Chat Wide-ranging discussion on all film-related matters.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-11-2007, 08:12 AM   #1
DB7
is scavenging through life's very constant lulls
Administrator
 
DB7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Shrops
Posts: 6,186
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (10)
Default Watchdog criticises gun movie ads

Watchdog criticises gun movie ads
Actor Clive Owen appeared in one of the posters for Shoot 'Em Up
Complaints about a set of film posters featuring actors brandishing guns have been upheld by advertising watchdogs.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said adverts for the film Shoot 'Em Up, which received 55 complaints, could be seen to glamorise violence.

One poster shows actor Clive Owen leaping and with guns in both hands pointing towards the viewer.

The ASA is holding a seminar in Nottingham after a sharp rise in complaints about violent imagery.

In a second poster, actor Paul Giamatti was shown holding a gun and a mobile phone with the line: "Just another family man making a living."

Entertainment Film Distributors Ltd disagreed with the complaints, saying Owen's guns were angled away from the viewer.

The distributor added that the poster featuring Owen had been approved by the Advertising Viewing Committee of the Film Distribution Association.

However, the ASA said the actor's expression was aggressive, and the posters could be seen to condone violence. It ordered that the two posters should not be displayed again.

The ASA has received more than 1,700 complaints about violent imagery in adverts so far this year, almost twice as many as last year.

The authority said it takes the increase very seriously.
DB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2007, 08:38 AM   #2
is happy
Chief Member OBME
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Posts: 15,800
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (10)
Default

I wonder what they would have made of these little beauties ....




Bats.
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2007, 08:45 AM   #3
is happy
Chief Member OBME
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Posts: 15,800
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (10)
Default

I remember this one having 'censor' problems too ....





Before and after the watchdogs intervention.

Bats.

Last edited by batman; 21-11-2007 at 09:00 AM. Reason: typo, or am i type a, i can never remember
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2007, 09:47 AM   #4
is bored with Guardian readers
Senior Member
 
oxfam1uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Saffron Walden
Posts: 183
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Rather unrealistic. I'm sure Carole Bouquet's bum doesn't look anything like that - not that I've any first hand experience ...
oxfam1uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2007, 09:52 AM   #5
is happy
Chief Member OBME
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Posts: 15,800
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (10)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oxfam1uk View Post
Rather unrealistic. I'm sure Carole Bouquet's bum doesn't look anything like that - not that I've any first hand experience ...

... I believe that there is another poster for Pittsburgh where that bum got into trouble - and they painted shorts over it!

From TIME magazine ....

"James Bond movies are known for racy scenes, but the sexiest part of For Your Eyes Only may very well be the advertising poster. It is standard Bondage: a cheeky shot of a woman dangling a crossbow in her hand while Roger Moore, as 007, aims a pistol between her calipered legs. While Boston did not go so far as to ban the poster, the editorial Bowdlers at the Globe and the Los Angeles Times deemed the poster suitable for their eyes only and demurely cropped out everything just above the knee. At the Pittsburgh Press, editors actually put a pair of shorts on the leggy lady. Amidst the furor, three models who had posed for the poster went out on their limbs claiming fame. Photographer Morgan Kane ended all speculation with the announcement that the legwork was the product of Joyce Bartle, 22, a native New Yorker. "I was embarrassed that I had to prove that the legs were mine," says Bartle. "You know your own legs when you see them." After all, the Wilhelmina model has filled stockings for Hanes, L'Eggs and Givenchy. Bartle scarcely minds all the controversy. Says she: "This will give me a leg up on my competitors."

I'll try and track down a copy of that poster.

Bats.

Last edited by batman; 21-11-2007 at 10:02 AM. Reason: extra info
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:25 AM.
style mods @ GFXstyles.com Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.