![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| General Film Chat Wide-ranging discussion on all film-related matters. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
ChristineCB
has no status.
Senior Member
|
V, any idea why?
I mean - the story sounds pretty interesting-to-me - retired biz exec, kidnapped and ransomed. Wifey-poo gets a note, la de da da... there are bound to be some skeletons in closets, and there are. The kidnappers are, of course, not what they seem to be. Thinking of the story and events along its way, and realizing how well I recall those details, I am even more confused about my poor and dulled reaction to it. I think I don't care about Robert Redford's character from the outset, and it just gets less as the story unfolds - not bad, just less. Helen Mirren's gets my sympathy, but even then, I find myself going, "Oh well... who cares..." And of course, Willem Dafoe and "my sympathy" are never going together. He almost always earns a loathing. But an interesting loathing, at least. Here, though... no... Was there anything specifically wrong that you detected in this film? I mean, other than "putting in the DVD"? ha ha |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Brett Sinclair
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |