Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainWaggett
But clearly lots of people care about their private lives - including, I assume, everyone on these boards or we'd never read any biographies. As you say, image is on screen is what matters so there's absolutely no reason why someone now should feel obliged to hide their interest in knitting or macrame. But I don't get why people assume that the on-screen persona should reflect the off-screen reality - bit scary to be a fan of Christopher Lee or Vincent Price if that were really the case!
BTW, another famous embroiderer, though not an actor, is former TUC boss Norman Willis.
|
Excellent point Captain and a good view. However what I was trying to say is this. We, the public do not control celebrities, they intend to 'control us'. This was the case with the old cinema with artistes mostly (strictly) under studio control - promoting the (perhaps untrue) image to us. Image sells tickets and it still does. Persons with poor image off screen are not too popular. Is it really any better with current stars earning huge fees much larger than the old timers pretending to 'save the planet and adopt an ethnic child from Africa' whilst driving six 4 by 4s?
Truth or Gossip is this the choice? Newspapers get much stick on this site so; what is truth and what is gossip. Do we really trust 'Hello' etc??