![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| General Film Chat Wide-ranging discussion on all film-related matters. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
has no status.
Junior Member
|
One way to approach such a film is to treat it as a manifestation of psychological processes, or perhaps as a work which consciously plays with perceived psychological processes. A psychoanalysis of that sort would no doubt be justified both by the writings of Buñuel as well as by the content and style of the film which appear to be laden with Freudian (or perhaps Lacanian) meaning. But perhaps we can also consider the emotional value of a surrealist film like Un Chien Andalou, experiencing it on a more visceral level. After all, Buñuel himself was "seduced by that passion for the irrational." Are we as viewers seduced by that passion as well? And if so, how is that emotional impact conveyed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
is feeling moderate
Moderator
|
I think the only way to experience it is by the visceral level...if you react either with fascination or repulsion - and Bunuel was probably after both responses - psychological analysis becomes superfluous; Bunuel wanted reaction, not analysis....
__________________
Bit of a Bay Window, what?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Bunuel was not interested in his films being treated as Avant Garde fantasies.
Yes, he wanted to provoke deep reactions from the spectator. That is why he'd always maintained that Un Chien Andalou was "a desperate call to murder". I always felt the film was a protest against the entrenched apathy of the middle class...but Bunuel hated the analytical "semiotic" approach to film criticism, so I'll shut up now, out of respect for a great filmmaker.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
Contact Us - Archive - Home pg - Forum - Top | ![]() |
| style mods @ GFXstyles.com | Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie | SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc. |