![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| General Film Chat Wide-ranging discussion on all film-related matters. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Wolfgang
has no status.
Senior Member
|
I just think it is in human nature to relive past experiences, to recapture those feelings you have when you first experience something. Sometimes repeat viewing can offer something new or more, but if that was our main motivation then we would watch something we have not seen before.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
ChristineCB
has no status.
Senior Member
|
I agree with your point, Wolfie. I forgot that obvious motivation, and upon occasion, I've re-watched a film for the exact opposite reason - "Was the film THAT bad? How could it be? I should watch it again with different expectations..."
And when it's bad the next time, well, at least I know it wasn't because my expectations were 'violated' because of hyped previews. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
smudge
is back at work now, but it pays for the weekends!
Moderator
|
Quote:
If I am vaguely interested thereafter, I'll buy the DVD/go to the flicks after the hype has died down and see how I REALLY feel about it. On the other hand, as Wolfgang has said, there's that 'Proustian' thing when I'll go back to see how it feels or to remeber how it did feel when I first saw that film. The other day I watched JAWS for the first time in a very long time, and vividly recalled arriving as a family, only to find the queue snaking round the block. We killed time in the nearby shopping centre and waited for the next queue to form up... Finally, with best part of a couple of thousand titles on the shelf, somebody will ask to see something, or I'll just be tidying/browsing and I'll think, "Haven't seen that for ages..." and there you go ! SMUDGE |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Phil Turner
has no status.
Senior Member
|
I generally like to give films a second chance. Occasionally, a classic film has fallen short of my expectations because I've been influenced by the hype and its lofty reputation. Second time around, when my expectations are more realistic, the film has been more enjoyable. This happened recently when I re-watched an American film, the Max Ophuls/Joan Fontaine classic Letter from an Unknown Woman. The second viewing was altogether more enjoyable, when I accepted the film for what it was.
Regards Phil Turner |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
merryowen
has no status.
Member
|
So Klaus Klinski is sailing down the Amazon in a paddle steamer.
He is sitting on the top deck with a foot long cigar in his mouth and watching a live performance of Bellini's I Puritani. The top tenor is Enrico Caruso. The ship is sinking. Claudia Cardinale is waiting on the riverbank. She is shrieking with delight at Klinski's antic and clearly has some ideas of her own as how to round off the evening. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
smudge
is back at work now, but it pays for the weekends!
Moderator
|
Quote:
As my knowledge of film grows, what I get from a film will change over the years. As I began to appreciate cinematography more and more I would find (for example) something like just one scene, perfectly lit, would jump out of a film at me. Or character performers - when I've seen the film and appreciate the whole, I can start properly noticing the subtle performances going on in the background. The same thing goes for a good piece of writing/construction - I may have been too busy just 'watching' at first to notice how cleverly the film was crafted, and the penny often drops second time around. Sometimes none of this applies and I am just going back to an undemanding piece of entertainment/amusement simply to get lost in that familiar world and relax.... SMUDGE |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
filmlover2007
has no status.
Junior Member
|
I only rewatch films I enjoy. And I prefer films that are more obcure than the overrated "classics" that all the critics sing the praises of.
I rewatch films for the character actors, classic scenes, classic set-pieces, dialogue, cinematography, music, and a director's style. I prefer watching films you can get completely absorbed and lost in. Films that become pure escapism and entertainment. Mainly, films before 1980 are the ones I tend to watch the most. The other day, I saw for the firs time, THE ENEMY BELOW. Not only did I love every minute of it, I rewatched the film the next day because I enjoyed the complete package so much. It got me thinking why the film was so good, and the only reason I can think of is that it's one of those films that completely envelopes the viewer. Hardly any contemporary films are capable of doing this and I think that's why old movies, classic movies, are more popular now than they've ever been. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
samkydd
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Some films, especially comedies, pack so much into them that quite often you miss a throw-away line or incidental bit of background humour the first time round and so you don't mind watching again to see new things uncovered. Films which have great characters encourage you to watch again and again because you feel the need to spend more time with them.
With certain films once you've seen it there is no interest at all in seeing repeats; The Shawshank Redemption, The Killing Fields, The Deerhunter, The Omen, The Exorcist (most of them seem to start with "The") and unfortunately there are more of these than the former. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |