Quote:
Originally posted by samkydd@Apr 14 2005, 11:00 AM
I have many video tapes still and have no intention of playing the consumer spending game and replacing them all with DVDs. I refused to do it with vinyl records to CD, and now my argument that vinyl sounds better than CD is bearing fruit because more and more people seem to agree.
|
You're not comparing like with like, because while a vinyl LP is quite capable of resolving sensational sound quality if played back on suitably high-end equipment, not even the finest VHS deck in the world can resolve more than about 250 lines of information - half that of a typical DVD.
Quote:
|
I watch mainly older films, 1930s to 1980s, and I can't believe that there is much improvement in the quality on DVD over VHS, especially with old Will Hay and Ealing black and whites.
|
It depends on who's doing the mastering - Studio Ca nal, who own the Ealing catalogue, have tended to be pretty lazy and aside from the convenience factor (though this is a pretty major plus in itself - I can't watch VHS tapes in bed on my laptop!) there's not much in the way of dramatic improvement.
But the best Powell & Pressburger DVDs from Criterion, Carlton and the BFI (whose
The Edge of the World has a reference-quality black-and-white picture) are something else again - there's no way you can match the quality of Criterion's
The Red Shoes on VHS because even aside from the picture resolution issues, VHS simply isn't capable of resolving strong colours to that degree of fidelity.
And of course with widescreen material a good DVD should piss all over VHS from a very great height, anamorphic compression adding roughly a third more detail again. Compare the Superbit transfer of
Lawrence of Arabia with the VHS - there's no contest whatsoever.