![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| Looking for a Video/DVD (Film) Searching for a UK film title that isn't freely available? Post a request here for help or trades. Established Members only |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Windthrop
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Both films have their strong points and their weaknesses but one thing they are equal on IMHO is the quality of the cast - Robert Morley vs Peter Finch John Neville vs John Fraser Ralph Richardson vs James Mason Edward Chapman vs Lionel Jeffries Dennis Price vs Emyrs Jones Phyllis Calvert vs Yvonne Mitchell Alexander Knox vs Nigel Patrick |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
CaptainWaggett
is gloomy no more
Senior Member
|
The Morley one, IIRC, has more genuine trial transcript, some of which must have raised a few eyebrows in 1960. In many ways it's a lot bolder than the Stephen Fry version which seemed to do everything it could to suggest that the only reason Oscar hung around with rent-boys was so he could read poetry to them
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
maturin
is open to suggestions
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Last edited by maturin; 23-05-2008 at 11:26 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
batman
is a sucker for a small face
Chief Member OBME
|
I like both Morley and Finch versions. Both had good casts and the scripts were equalling interesting. I found the Fry version (although he was perfect in the role) to be too concerned with what went on in private rather than concentrate on the known facts. Therefore we ended up with a rather unconvincing and disjointed effort.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
christoph404
has no status.
Moderator
|
"The Trials of Oscar Wilde" wins hands down for me. Visually it looks superb and is streets ahead of the Morley version and the more recent Fry outing, pardon the pun. Ken Hughes had Ken Adam on the production design for "The Trials of Oscar Wilde" and Ted Moore photographing the whole thing in "Super Technirama" For me it is a visual stunner as well as the acting and script being very good. I think critically it did quite well especially in Europe but I don't think it was accepted because of the subject matter. It didn't make its money back but I think the budget was pretty hefty to begin with.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks | ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |