Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Crook
That's why a lot of lawyers get very rich from debating it  :
It has added complexity when the rights to different films are passed from one company to another, and they don't always pass on the rights to all the films to the same company. Do that two or three times and it makes it very hard to track down the rights holders
Steve
|
How true. I think its very sad when these very old flicks which are now largely forgot by today’s generation are even more hampered to get a screening, unless its in some art house in London, by the blasted nutters who just want to sit on reels of film, watch them rot and just have them. There is more big brother in the UK watching over your shoulder than we can possibly number here. Sad when my parents fought for our freedom and at 90 even they don’t rate the UK’s chances anymore. Mr Pastry would have none of it bless him. As a keen fan of Richard Hearne and spoken to may in my time who would like to see his films all over again, wouldn’t it be nice to have a boxed set out where we can relive the golden years of FAMILY comedy and rekindle some old values when it was good to laugh, and enjoy the simple things.
Someone in the entertainment industry recently told me that Norman Wisdom had never seen There was a crooked Man since it was first shown. That’s the sad state of British media for you folks..
The real blessing is that there are still many film amateur collectors out there who own prints and are keen to let you view classics in private home screenings rather than pass films onto archives. This way at least the public can still enjoy an artists work freely. Remember freedom?