Quote:
Originally Posted by Babalugats
evil grip of Macca-Yoko ?
That's a bit much. I think someone else needs to get a grip.
Regardless, the film is pretty bad and hardly accurate.
|
To be fair, I dare say that there is some truth in this (it's no secret, is it, that Sir Paul is something of a control freak, though I mean no disrespect to the man, since I consider him to be something of a genius and would be happy to credit him with almost single-handedly keeping The Beatles together against considerable odds during their last few years - for which I am eternally grateful).
Whatever the truth, though, it can be no coincidence that various film projects, BIRTH OF THE BEATLES and COMPLETE BEATLES most prominent amongst them, have all but been wiped off the face of popular culture. For my part, I've always assumed that Apple (to de-personalise it a touch, although someone rather important in Beatles-terms must ultimately be responsible for the directives on such matters) bought the rights to these and shelved them in order to get them off the market to make room for the Apple-authorised version of events in the shape of The Anthology CDs, TV series, DVDs and book (which, although it promised warts and all insight, is still a slightly glossy re-telling).
On a different note, the reason why 'Let It Be' hasn't seen the light of day for so long appears to have actually been down to George (according to the 33rpm pocket-size book on the album of the same name) who felt that the film represented a dark time in his life which he wanted to forget.