![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Gibbie
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Since the time movies were made, there seems to be a Britishness mode of movies by decades. For example, early movies tended to focus on Bull Drummond adventure type heroes and then there were the Edwardian worldly gentleman types (David Niven). World War II stories influenced American notions of Britain well into the 70s. The Beatles had a huge influence on notions of Britishness. With all the cultural mix in the 60s most internationals tended to blend everything from Churchillian conservativeness to Mod style, especially in the case of James Bond and the Avengers. By the mid-80s, there developed a strong anti-British feeling due to political factors from anti-British sources and you will notice that even British made movies tended to show Britishness as dark and hypocritical. This is still the case. Most made for TV movies that are exported take this line or want to be seen as multicultural and will take a slight at the past, which is a mistake on both accounts. Early movies portrayed the do-the-right-thing sort of traditional Britishness with actors like Ronald Coleman and on the other hand the coy gentleman type of Robert Donat. Many people still love the movies that represent the classy do the right thing British traditional character. The last good example of this was Chariots of Fire in the early 80s, which won an academy and saved British film - yet the industry moved in another direction. Movies like Sink the Bismark showed British character, while the 50s Ealing comedies set the stage for what people think of as cheeky British humo(u)r. While certainly not traditional, the Bond films and A Hard Days Night took Britain international and influenced everything. In the 70s, there was the Python crowd and the mysteries, like Tinkor Tailor Soldier Spy, or period pieces, like Glenda Jackson's Elizabeth R, that played on public television had a terrific influence on ideas of British national identity. Chariots was huge, but the two main characters were posited outside the mainstream, but reflect some notions of Britain in the 20s (although beware of reading history via the movies, even the good ones - read primary sources in addition from the period, if you want to understand British character). The Pythons influenced notions of British character worldwide with follow up from Dudley Moore, which later morphed into the Brassed Off/Trainspotting deadend thing. In the 90s, TV movies like Brett's Sherlock Holmes and Thaw's Inspector Morse had a huge influence. Also movies wishboned the whole view of British character from Sense and Sensibility to The Full Monty. There is a lot missing here like the character movies of Hitchcock and Lean, as well as, more historical movies. Frankly, while people knock it, many people still think of the British in the Victorian sense (which many go to Britain expecting) - which puts Mary Poppins at the top with Julie Andrews. It may sound silly now, but that's what American kids grew up with and other internationals did too. I must vote Mary Poppins. Further resources: The British Film Resource http://www.britishfilm.org.uk/ British Film Institute http://www.bfi.org.uk/ Brit Films http://www.britfilms.com/ |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Gibbie
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
You're welcome. I hope it helps your studies at uni. I don't know what your professors are like, but many academics are rather hostile to traditional life. A safe way to deal with this issue is write a paper that addresses critical questions about national identity in film through the perceptions of the directors (the real movie authors) or the public. This way it is easier for your to write about those substantive issues you want to think through and not cost you a grade for even asking the questions. Also, check on www.amazon.co.uk for books on film and read the reader reviews for potential help. I've looked on movie books myself and some of the good studies are quite expensive. School or public library may have a copy. Best wishes, Gibbie |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Gibbie
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
MissGossage
has no status.
Junior Member
|
With surprisingly few exceptions, the auteur theory is largely irrelevant to British film - which is perhaps one of the reasons they're still undervalued by the critical establishment.
For instance, who is the 'auteur' behind, say, the Ealing comedies or Gainsborough melodramas? And can we really read 'The Italian Job' as "un film de Peter Collinson" with a straight face? If you haven't already come across it, I thoroughly recommend Jeffrey Richards' self-explanatory 'Films and British National Identity', the best book-length study of the subject I can think of, which includes some fascinating chapters on subjects I previously knew next to nothing about (the black socialist Paul Robeson's motives for starring in films unashamedly glorifying the British empire, for instance). |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
British culture is so diverse that I don't think any one film could capture it all. It's like trying to capture the ocean in a milk bottle Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |