Sex Object = Academy Awards - Britmovie - British Film Forum

Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum
Home Page Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

 »   Britmovie - British Film Forum » Lobby » Ask a Film Question » Media Studies

Notices


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22-09-2008, 11:29 AM
  post #1
Woogyman has no status.
Junior Member
 
Woogyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 18
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default Sex Object = Academy Awards

Do you guys believe female oscar winners have been portrayed as sex objects in films they have won the Oscar(s) in? (or nominated in) Looking at the following movies...
Monster
L.A. Confidential
Casino

or your general views/thoughts!

Thanks.

Woogyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2008, 08:26 PM
  post #2
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,776
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woogyman View Post
Do you guys believe female oscar winners have been portrayed as sex objects in films they have won the Oscar(s) in? (or nominated in) Looking at the following movies...
Monster
L.A. Confidential
Casino

or your general views/thoughts!

Thanks.
Make a list of all the winners (and possibly all of the nominees) and then say how many of them might have won because they are regarded as sex objects. It probably is the case for some of them, but is it for all of them?

Did Helen Mirren win for The Queen because she was a sex object?
Helen can be very sexy, but was she at all sexy in that role?

And when you've done it for the ladies, do it again for the fellas and see how many of them might have won because of their looks rather than because of their acting ability

Steve
Steve Crook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2008, 09:09 PM
  post #3
penfold is ready for hibernation
Moderator
 
penfold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 4,347
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woogyman View Post
Do you guys believe female oscar winners have been portrayed as sex objects in films they have won the Oscar(s) in? (or nominated in) Looking at the following movies...
Monster
L.A. Confidential
Casino

or your general views/thoughts!

Thanks.
Have you seen Monster ?? If so, you would know that Charlize Theron is heavily disguised in it; and plays the absolute antithesis of a sex object in the film.

Actually, your question makes no sense. Are you asking if the actresses have won Oscars by playing sex objects; or are you asking if the actresses, once nominated, have been portrayed as sex objects in the media ???

Get your question sorted, watch the films, form your own opinion, and then share; then we'll bat it about a bit and let you know what we think, how does that grab you??

Bit of a Bay Window, what??
penfold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2008, 09:12 PM
  post #4
Wicked Lady is needing a stiff drink!
Senior Member
 
Wicked Lady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 764
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

I've often thought that being too attractive was a disadvantage for getting an Oscar for both male and female actors.
Wicked Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-09-2008, 09:33 PM
  post #5
narabdela is feeling frisky.
Senior Member
 
narabdela's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Gender: Male
Posts: 267
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by penfold View Post
Get your question sorted, watch the films, form your own opinion, and then share; then we'll bat it about a bit and let you know what we think, how does that grab you??
Excellent advice. No gain without pain in this life I'm afraid. I'm willing to discuss your conclusions, but I'm not going to sit an exam for you. The purpose of an education is to assimilate information and learn how to process and use it.
narabdela is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2008, 04:49 PM
  post #6
Moor Larkin is passing the time
Senior Member
 
Moor Larkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North West Frontier
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Dangerous Talk

Moor Larkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2008, 06:26 PM
  post #7
Woogyman has no status.
Junior Member
 
Woogyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 18
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Sorry for not making much sense! I've actually done most of my research!

My actual question is "Have Female Oscar Winners been portrayed as a Sex Object in the film they have won the Oscar (or nominated in)"
My hypothesis, is that a large number of female actresses have been portrayed as a sex object in films they have won Oscars in.
Going deeper into this and asking is it the sex role which got these actresses nominated for an Oscar and even win (which will be hard to find out). This is why i am also looking into Institutional detail - The Oscars; the voting system and how it might affect nominations. I did find out, "Actors constitute the largest voting bloc, numbering 1,311 members" therefore voting may be rather bias!

I also looked into Winning Trends and found that a large number of actresses have won (or been nominated for) for portraying hookers (girls of the night, party girls, whores, call girls, madams, etc.), example:
1. Julia Roberts was nominated as Best Actress for her role as a LA hooker/escort in Pretty Woman (1990)
2. Mira Sorvino won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar as a bubble-headed prostitute in Mighty Aphrodite (1995) - in the same year, two other nominees for Best Actress also played prostitutes: Sharon Stone for Casino (1995) and Elisabeth Shue for Leaving Las Vegas (1995)
3. Kim Basinger won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar as a Veronica Lake-look-alike hooker in L.A. Confidential (1997)
4. Charlize Theron won the Best Actress Oscar as a serial-killer prostitute in Monster (2003)

After these findings, i watched the following films, Monster, L.A. Confidential and Casino and looked into whether the actresses have been portrayed as sex objects in these films. My findings...
Casino (1995) - Sharon Stone plays Ginger McKenna a attractive hustler and prostitute. She was nominated for best actress in a leading role. This supports my question since Sharon Stone was represented as a sex object (sexually attractive) throughout the film and was nominated for her role.

Monster (2003) - Charlize Theron plays Aileen Wuornos a serial killer and prostitute. She won the Best actress Oscar. However, she was not portrayed as sexually attractive which doesn't support my theory/question, but the question is did she win the award for playing a prostitute, a serial killer or playing a lesbian (love scene with Selby). I can also look into the concept of the Male Gaze!

L.A Confidential (1997) - Kim Basinger plays Lynn Bracken a Veronica Lake look a-like and a call girl. She won an Academy Award for best actress in supporting role. Throughout the film, she was portrayed as a sex object, sexually attractive (after looking into the mise-en-scene of couple scenes). She played a call girl and won an Oscar.

Watching these 3 films i found that these actresses have won Oscars/or nominated for one for playing a sex associated role, though only one was clearly not portrayed as a sex object (Charlize Theron in Monster). So, to some extent my research and analysis of these films supports my idea that female actresses have been portrayed as sex objects in the films they have won/nominated for a Oscar.

Now, i don't know what do actually do, have i finished? or shall i look into something else?

Thanks.

Women, Sex & Film...
womensexandfilm.blogspot.com
Woogyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2008, 06:31 PM
  post #8
CaptainWaggett is looking forward to A Little Night Music at the Menier
Senior Member
 
CaptainWaggett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 7,407
Country:
iTrader: (3)
Default

Are you looking at those actresses who have won the Best Actress Oscar while not playing sex objects - Hilary Swank, Helen Mirren, Nicole Kidman, Julia Roberts to name 4 since 2000?
CaptainWaggett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2008, 06:39 PM
  post #9
Woogyman has no status.
Junior Member
 
Woogyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 18
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainWaggett View Post
Are you looking at those actresses who have won the Best Actress Oscar while not playing sex objects - Hilary Swank, Helen Mirren, Nicole Kidman, Julia Roberts to name 4 since 2000?
No, should i?
I suppose, looking into something that disagrees with my theory would be relevant. These characters are rather sexually attractive but obviously didn't play a sex role. I mean, a sex object doesn't necessarily mean playing a sex role (call girl, etc.).

Sex Object: any person seen only as sexually attractive.

So, actually these actresses may support my theory!

Women, Sex & Film...
womensexandfilm.blogspot.com
Woogyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2008, 06:53 PM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,776
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woogyman View Post
Sorry for not making much sense! I've actually done most of my research!
No you haven't. You haven't even started.

Quote:
Now, i don't know what do actually do, have i finished? or shall i look into something else?

Thanks.
You've looked at 3 films, you've considered 4 cases. Your results show a large(ish) number that support your theory - but only from a minuscule sample of all the people that have been nominated.

That's why I suggested in my first post in this thread that you look at some more. And look at the men as well as the women.

If I was marking your paper it'd be an instant fail.
1/10 Must try harder

Steve
Steve Crook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2008, 06:55 PM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,776
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woogyman View Post
No, should i?
I suppose, looking into something that disagrees with my theory would be relevant. These characters are rather sexually attractive but obviously didn't play a sex role. I mean, a sex object doesn't necessarily mean playing a sex role (call girl, etc.).

Sex Object: any person seen only as sexually attractive.

So, actually these actresses may support my theory!
Yes, you should look at things that appear to disagree with your theory.
That's how you test a theory

Steve
Steve Crook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2008, 07:02 PM
moonfleet is looking for Providence
Senior Member
 
moonfleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pau- France
Gender: Female
Posts: 595
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woogyman View Post
No, should i?
I suppose, looking into something that disagrees with my theory would be relevant. These characters are rather sexually attractive but obviously didn't play a sex role. I mean, a sex object doesn't necessarily mean playing a sex role (call girl, etc.).

Sex Object: any person seen only as sexually attractive.

So, actually these actresses may support my theory!
Quote:"Sex Object: any person seen only as sexually atractive"

For who ??....some actors can be "perceived" as sexually atractive AND play very well, as Sharon Stone did in "Casino" !!!

Moon.


"Very difficult !" "Craazy!"
moonfleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2008, 07:06 PM
Woogyman has no status.
Junior Member
 
Woogyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 18
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Thanks! I need help to create open questions for a focus group which will help answer/test my theory...

Women, Sex & Film...
womensexandfilm.blogspot.com
Woogyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2008, 07:36 PM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,776
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woogyman View Post
Thanks! I need help to create open questions for a focus group which will help answer/test my theory...
Why?

Here's a novel idea, why not just research it yourself

Steve
Steve Crook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26-09-2008, 06:00 PM
Woogyman has no status.
Junior Member
 
Woogyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 18
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

I asked, i needed help creating questions, not asking you to create the questions. I mean, my theory being that female oscar winners have been portrayed as sex objects in the films they have won the oscar in, but how will i create open questions to test it? I mean, asking the members of the public won't help me, how will they know that playing a sex object is what got the actresses to win an Oscar. How will it help?

On Thrusday im going to the BFI (bfi National Library), what shall i look out for and photocopy? Just a list of past Oscar winners? I don't want my time there to be a waste of time. Thanks.

Women, Sex & Film...
womensexandfilm.blogspot.com
Woogyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:45 AM.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie