Mandela never 'approved' of any kind of violence, especially 'street violence' as it could cause the loss of innocent lives. He saw that violence was necessary but only as a 'last resort', but he felt huge guilt about the use of it ....name='CaptainWaggett' date='24 July 2010 - 02:13 PM' timestamp='1279977236' post='455740']
He's changed his ideas then
"Four forms of violence were possible. There is sabotage, there is guerrilla warfare, there is terrorism, and there is open revolution. We chose to adopt the first. Sabotage did not involve loss of life, and it offered the best hope for future race relations. Bitterness would be kept to a minimum and, if the policy bore fruit, democratic government could become a reality." - Nelson Mandela (1964)
.... Mandela saw that 'open revolution', which would more likely than not include 'street violence', would not succeed and that the lasting legacy of such action would be an increase of hatred against the general population. By reluctantly adopting a strategy of 'sabotage', he felt that the 'responsibilty' would be taken on board by those committing such acts and not by the general black population.
More recently Mandela displayed his 'disapproval' of violence by speaking out against plans to have details of ANC 'atrocities' removed from the official records of The Truth and Reconciliation Commission. He felt that these 'shameful incidents' should not be hidden.
![]()

Reply With Quote





