![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| Off-Topic Discussion For infrequent and stimulating chat about everyday topics from the weather to world news, sport and politics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
![]() Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
But that idea was abandoned by British newspapers (and some radio & TV shows) some years ago. People often use adverse press reporting before the trial in an appeal so the press doing a bit of rabble rousing or condemning people before their trial usually only helps them get off. But the press doesn't really care about the result, they only want to sell newspapers and they don't care how they do it Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
davidb
is getting 8 hours pay for 3 hours work
Senior Member
|
i suppose to the currant bun ,this story has got everything ,a shameless style family ,a "paedo "stepfather ,an allegation of child neglect ,bet the editor cant sleep at night with the excitement , im not a fan of these people as you may have read in earlier posts ,the jobless welfare dependant culture annoys me ,especially when the poles can find work within 5 seconds of setting foot here , but id like to see them at least have a fair trial ,any of us could be accused of something ,dont like the idea of trial by tabloid newspaper
Last edited by davidb; 13-04-2008 at 12:43 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
![]() Newspapers used to be under threat of prosecution for contempt of court if they breached the sub judice idea. But nowadays, newspapers just put such prosecutions down as justifiable expenses ![]() Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Another "justifiable expense" that can be written off
![]() Editors don't have all that much power nowadays. Go for the owners - Murdoch, Barclay brothers, Desmond, Sullivan etc. It's only if they are personally fined very heavily (about the GDP of a medium sized country) or jailed, that anything will be noticed. Similar with the few that are controlled by corporations rather than individual owners, like Associated newspapers, Guardian group, Trinity Mirror etc. Lock 'em all up and throw away the key. The world would be a better place without them. Most fines that are imposed aren't even noticed. Even the "substantial damages" recently imposed on the Express & Star for their shameful coverage of (and fiction about) Madeleine McCann and her parents. But forcing them to print a huge front page apology, they noticed that because there was a chance it would make their readers realise that they just make up a lot of their stories Steve |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
samkydd
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
This is understandable for someone like a nurse who is on fairly low income and is dedicated to the job, then reads in the 'paper about a footballer who earns more in a week than he/she could in ten years! The footballer may be worth every penny but after reading it that person may go to work feeling more than a little hard done by! Newspapers often report on benefit cheats receiving £30K a year for spawning children and sitting on their arse all day, when others are putting in 40 hours a week in a crap factory for less than half that amount! Some of these stories may be made-up or exagerated but they still have the desired effect of pissing the working man off! So stop buying newspapers and get a decent magazine instead! Last edited by samkydd; 13-04-2008 at 03:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks | ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |