Quote:
Originally Posted by DB7
I'm in two minds on this, I can see why 'clean' athletes wouldn't want him as part of the team and that his taking the place of another athlete would grate. But shouldn't wrongdoers have the chance of redemption?
|
It's a matter of trust I suppose because if Chambers won anything there would always be people who suspected that it was through chemical enhancements. So even if he was as "clean as a whistle" (a puzzling expression because most whistles I've seen have been full of other people's spit) there would always be an element of doubt.
It also sends out a signal that if you do eventually get caught cheating then all will be forgiven, and you are then free to make a lucrative career on the after-dinner circuit as a "bad boy made good", when in reality had you not been found out you may have continued cheating indefinitely. If it's in your nature to be corrupt then you will be tempted to cheat again otherwise you wouldn't have dreamt of doing it in the first place!
With cheating scandals in athletics and cycling in the main over many years it isn't surprising that interest in these sports is (D)waining, and the more cheats prosper then the lesser the chances are of attracting participants and fans and the sports surviving in the future.