![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
scholes
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Chelsea are simply the team to hate, which goes with the territory of success. They have far surpassed United and Arsenal in this respect. Apart from this though it is far from surprising- 3rd Richest man in world buys hitherto unsuccessful club, with the sole purpose of turning it into a Frankenstein Monster. Appoints Jose Mouhinho who in turn appoints himself as ' The Special One'. Instills in his team a similar arrogance. Play a brand of powerful, percentage football with a safety first tag. Have the ability to out bid any one. Achieve immediate success over two seasons. Sack TSO,and appoint a low profile Israeli. Internal strife looms large. People scoff accordingly 'I told you so' Next move.............. Manchester City beat Chelsea in the Youth cup last night, the former being assembled at a sixth of the cost of the latter. Can't see what loyalty has got to do with things anti-Chelsea. Players will come and go, some of it's about passion and a desire to play football some of it's to do with a seriously large pay packet. You can't cite Rooney and Tevez as being disloyal ,otherwise what are Lampard and the two Coles doing at the Bridge? West Ham have always had a sturdy reputation for producing attractive if largely toothless football, but they also boast that hotbed for producing a plethora of young talent in 'The Academy'. Moore, Peters, Brooking, Cottee, Lampards snr and jnr. Cole , Carrick,and Rio Ferdinand to name the obvious. All I can say is that it will be interesting to see how Chelsea can progress with new management. They have extremely talented players, it is down to the best way of harnessing them. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
batman
is little big horn
Chief Member
|
Quote:
I can cite Rooney, Tevez as much as I can anyone else if I wish to illustrate a point. You really must be a Reds fans as I notice you didn't speak up for Yakubu. ![]() If you read back over my football related posts you will see that I am very objective in my praise and criticism of Chelsea. I am probably the least biased person on this forum when it comes to my football team, so the 'raw nerve' comment is a bit unfair. People can carry on criticising Chelsea's dour perfromances by all means .... I just wish they didn't keep prattling on about them being worse than everyone else in the Premiership when it comes to greed and hypocrisy. Last edited by batman; 17-04-2008 at 12:36 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
scholes
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Good Lord, you are sensitive creature Bats.
I can't see how my response was in any way shape or form a typical Redrant. It certainly isn't biased nor is it hypocritical. I merely summarised as follows: Understandable why Chelsea are unpopular. Players will go where best to further their careers including Mr. Yakubu. Loyalty has nothing to do with it. West Ham have produce some of the finest talents in English football. Manchester City's youth team is in good health. I hope Chelsea can prove doubters wrong and find a way forward as they have the potential to be a great team. I am a football fan first. Hope that clears things up. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
batman
is little big horn
Chief Member
|
Quote:
Ignore me ..... I will go and lie down in a quiet corner! Last edited by batman; 17-04-2008 at 12:58 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Amethyst_Isle
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() Basillllllllllllll.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
batman
is little big horn
Chief Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |