Football Special - Page 19 - Britmovie - British Film Forum

Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum
Home Page Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

 »   Britmovie - British Film Forum » Back Row » Off-Topic Discussion

Notices

Off-Topic Discussion For infrequent and stimulating chat about everyday topics from the weather to world news, sport and politics.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2007, 07:12 AM
David Brent has no status.
Senior Member
 
David Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 2,434
Country:
iTrader: (4)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harbottle View Post
As the Premiership is filled with foreign players to a ludicrous extent the choice is not exactly wide. Plus Michael Owen says he wants to play with Heskey so Sven is doing as he is told.
Not really much of a partnership.
Owen has been out of form/injured for too long and Emile Heskey has only scored 5 goals in his 43 previous England appearances.

Great selection McLaren.

Dave.

David Brent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 09:52 AM
orpheum has no status.
Senior Member
 
orpheum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,374
Country:
iTrader: (4)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fareham_Bee View Post
Ah but that is counter argued by the fact that many of the foriegn players demand knock ons.

Some Chelsea players were staying in first class hotels at clubs expense and the club paying their tax on that perk. One in particular had free flights home and back and free flights for his family to visit etc. It all adds up to just as expensive a package.

Many of these foriegners that are cheaper aren't as good, it's just this modern day king's new clothes that if he sounds Italian/Argentinian/Brazillian/etc he MUST be of quality, which as we all know, is nonsense.

There is no doubt that the amount of foriegners in the game has harmed it. I knew this would be the case from the outset, mainly because celebrity Fulham fan (oops sorry forgot he changed his allegances to successful Chelsea)David Mellor said foriegners would be good for the English game and make England a better side better equipped to play against other world class teams.

And we all know whatever Mellor says, think the opposite and you are right
On a club level it has made english clubs amongst the most feared opposition again.English clubs are now dominating the Champions League in the way that they were dominating Europe in the 1980s

Welcome To Highbury The Home Of Football
orpheum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 01:03 PM
DB7
DB7 is scavenging through life's very constant lulls
Administrator
 
DB7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Shrops
Posts: 6,477
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (10)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fareham_Bee View Post
There is no doubt that the amount of foriegners in the game has harmed it.

Imho the greatest damage has been done by ourselves. The selling off of school playing fields and a policy of building on inner city green land has led to there being few places for kids to play football. The places I played on as a kid are now housing estates and 2 superstores.

There was also the introduction of 90 minute catchment areas. If you're a coastal club this means half of your catchment area is the sea! And in the case of Liverpool you have Manchester United just down the road; so four Premiership sides fight over the same kids.

Imho, if a kid is good enough he will make it. From my experience with Liverpool's young players they are frequently overpaid, have a poor attitude, and spend most weekend in the pub getting bladdered.
DB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 02:03 PM
orpheum has no status.
Senior Member
 
orpheum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,374
Country:
iTrader: (4)
Default

The 90 minute catchment area was brought in to cover cases such as Beckham living in East London and playing for United.In London we have we now have 14 clubs fighting for the same players.So little wonder clubs have gone abroad where there are no such restrictions.

Welcome To Highbury The Home Of Football
orpheum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 02:23 PM
DB7
DB7 is scavenging through life's very constant lulls
Administrator
 
DB7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Shrops
Posts: 6,477
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (10)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orpheum View Post
The 90 minute catchment area was brought in to cover cases such as Beckham living in East London and playing for United.In London we have we now have 14 clubs fighting for the same players.So little wonder clubs have gone abroad where there are no such restrictions.
IIrc Utd circumvented it by flying Beckham to OT or moving his family? A player has got to be extremely promising for a club to sanctiion that outlay.

I agree about the London clubs especially, and probably the same in the West Midlands.

With us, youth players tend to fall into divide whereas they're not ready for the 1st team but beyond reserve football. The most talented is a young England U21 lad we sent to Soton - but appparently it's so amateurish there he wishes to return.

I don't really blame managers either, in the current climate you can't afford to spend time nurturing kids because it's a results-driven business and you will be sacked however worthy your excuses.
DB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 05:09 PM
lordtednfs has no status.
Senior Member
 
lordtednfs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 541
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Gordon Banks is talking about coming out of retirement!!!

Like heck. Robinson is a great keeper, remember that all goalies over the last 25+ years have had a couple of rough/howler games, Clemence, Shilton, James, Bonnetti and the rest. The future is in Robinson and especially young Green in time, safe as houses.

Maybe the premiership gods should make all foreign players become English citizens before joining an English club, they only come for the money and do the potential English/British players out of a chance earning and or of representing their countries? But the premiership gods cant see that. Money = bonuses for them and to heck with the national team.

Michael Owen has had his day. Heskey......hahaha. Crouchie reminds me of Big Bird from Sesame Street, too clumsy. Pace is what England needs up front. Defoe, as a Spurs fan, falls down too easily, get a lesson from Rodney Marsh. We just don't have a decent striker right now and are looking at Lampard and Gerrard to save our souls (S.O.S) Rooney is too volatile and under pressure can't hack it. Smifffy, well my Aunt Galdys would show him up. Aaron Lennon and Jermain Jenus are a great possibility along with Michael Dawson in defense along side John Terry and Ashley Cole. Lampard in midfield with Stevie G and thats it! Maclaren your days are numbered.

And don't go back to Paul Scholes....Donkey or what, it's like watching Come Dancing. Who ducked when Ronaldinho scored to beat England and yet was standing on the goal line? Scholes. Who gave away the same free kick? Scholes. Put him in a United shirt earining millions and will die for you? Scholes. Put him an England shirt for nothing and do nothing? Scholes.

We need help. Come on England!
lordtednfs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 11:44 PM
BristolUK has no status.
Senior Member
 
BristolUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Moncton, Canada
Posts: 285
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orpheum View Post
In London we have we now have 14 clubs fighting for the same players.So little wonder clubs have gone abroad where there are no such restrictions.
Out of curiosity, does anyone know how the population of the area 90 minutes from the London Clubs compares to the area 90 minutes from, say, Liverpool or ManU?

I imagine it's more but by how much?

14 sounds a lot going for the London clubs 'catchment area' but are they really more restricted than ManU, Man City, Bolton, Preston, Blackburn, Liverpool, Everton, Tranmere, Rochdale, Oldham, Bury, Stockport.......
BristolUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 12:34 AM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Posts: 10,638
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolUK View Post
Out of curiosity, does anyone know how the population of the area 90 minutes from the London Clubs compares to the area 90 minutes from, say, Liverpool or ManU?

I imagine it's more but by how much?

14 sounds a lot going for the London clubs 'catchment area' but are they really more restricted than ManU, Man City, Bolton, Preston, Blackburn, Liverpool, Everton, Tranmere, Rochdale, Oldham, Bury, Stockport.......
Population of Merseyside = 1,365,900
Population of Greater Manchester = 2,547,700
Population of Greater London = 7,420,600 (8m in whole SE region)
All figures approximate but give the right order of magnitude

So that's 4 teams (including Everton & Man City) sharing 4 million people, 1 million per team.
And 14 London teams sharing 8 million people, just over 1/2 million per team.
So the Northern teams have twice as many people per team in their catchment area

Population figures from Wikipedia which gives other breakdowns by region

Steve
Steve Crook is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 06:52 AM
Harleybloke is a potential lottery winner - honest!
Senior Member
 
Harleybloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,583
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DB7 View Post
Imho the greatest damage has been done by ourselves. The selling off of school playing fields and a policy of building on inner city green land has led to there being few places for kids to play football. The places I played on as a kid are now housing estates and 2 superstores.

There was also the introduction of 90 minute catchment areas. If you're a coastal club this means half of your catchment area is the sea! And in the case of Liverpool you have Manchester United just down the road; so four Premiership sides fight over the same kids.

Imho, if a kid is good enough he will make it. From my experience with Liverpool's young players they are frequently overpaid, have a poor attitude, and spend most weekend in the pub getting bladdered.
Watford Captain a while back was Andy Hessentahler, he commuted to Watford from Gillingham..............flexible 90 mins that methinks!

.....You couldn't hear it, if they were shooting at me with howitzers!
Harleybloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 07:05 AM
batman is in pussy heaven!
Chief Member OBME
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwich
Posts: 18,600
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (13)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DB7 View Post
From my experience with Liverpool's young players they are frequently overpaid, have a poor attitude, and spend most weekend in the pub getting bladdered.
A mate of mine used to live next door to the son of a certain ex-Liverpool legend.

The stories he told me of what that young man got up to were startling considering that he couldn't even get in the first team of our local club.

Definitely a case of too much money and too few brains!

Bats.

I wish I had claws.
batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 11:54 AM
orpheum has no status.
Senior Member
 
orpheum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,374
Country:
iTrader: (4)
Default

I have included Barnet,Watford and of course the newboys,the Daggers in my computation of 14 teams.

Welcome To Highbury The Home Of Football
orpheum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 08:29 PM
BristolUK has no status.
Senior Member
 
BristolUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Moncton, Canada
Posts: 285
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Crook View Post
Population of Merseyside = 1,365,900
Population of Greater Manchester = 2,547,700
Population of Greater London = 7,420,600 (8m in whole SE region)
All figures approximate but give the right order of magnitude

So that's 4 teams (including Everton & Man City) sharing 4 million people, 1 million per team.
And 14 London teams sharing 8 million people, just over 1/2 million per team.
So the Northern teams have twice as many people per team in their catchment area.
Steve

Thanks for that. However, if 14 London teams are being counted, then a fair comparison has to include similar clubs in the same area as Liverpool, Everton, ManU and Man City. To me it seems there are nearly as many clubs there as London.

Which means that a dozen clubs picking from 4m are at a disadvantage to 14 picking from 8m.
BristolUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2007, 09:31 AM
orpheum has no status.
Senior Member
 
orpheum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,374
Country:
iTrader: (4)
Default

Given that i have included Watford in London teams it is probably fair to include Bolton as a Gt Manchester team

Welcome To Highbury The Home Of Football
orpheum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2007, 12:23 PM
Harleybloke is a potential lottery winner - honest!
Senior Member
 
Harleybloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,583
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orpheum View Post
Given that i have included Watford in London teams it is probably fair to include Bolton as a Gt Manchester team
Judging by the shirts worn in the streets by kids add Brighton, Horsham, Swindon, Oxford, Gravesend.................................

.....You couldn't hear it, if they were shooting at me with howitzers!
Harleybloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 02:57 AM
BristolUK has no status.
Senior Member
 
BristolUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Moncton, Canada
Posts: 285
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orpheum View Post
Given that i have included Watford in London teams it is probably fair to include Bolton as a Gt Manchester team
And Rochdale, Stockport, Oldham, Bury, Wigan.

As Liverpool is included in the 4m, then Everton and Tranmere should be too. So with the two Manchester teams, there are 11.

With Blackburn, Preston and Burnley close by it begins to look as if those clubs have considerably fewer players in their catchment area than the London clubs have in theirs.
BristolUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:52 PM.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie