![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| Publications Forum for the discussion of old and new film-related books, magazines and publications. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
CaptainWaggett
is looking forward to A Little Night Music at the
Menier
Senior Member
|
As far as I can see (I buy a lot of film books for work), the coming of IMDB has more or less killed off books like that. I don't need a book that simply lists facts when I can get the information from a few clicks of my mouse. There's the Taschen series but they're more glossy photo books without much hard information but I can't think of anything newish that meets your description.
I'm interested in the idea that you don't want opinion. I know what you mean in one way - I'm going to watch any film with Dennis Price in it and a critic telling me that Master of Bankdam isn't very good (it isn't) won't deter me won't deter me because I'm going to see it and find something to enjoy anyway. But I'm still interested in hearing other's opinions and given that nobody can see every film, it's useful to have an idea of which films might be artistic worthwhile and which are just of historical interest. So I get frustrated by the purely factual books. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
CALF28
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Thanks for your reply and I know what you;re saying about IMDB, it's a very useful site, I use it all the time but it's just not as handy as a book. There's the book on the shelves, pick it up for a browse , take it to bed or even the loo. You can't do that with IMDB. David Quinlan's 'British Sound Films' is almost the perfect reference work on films, it's a shame he didn't carry on into the sixties. It's a shame no one else has written one, perhaps I might write one. Mmmm.... I quite enjoyed 'Master of Bankdam' I'll just have a look in my Quinlan and see what he says about it. Made in 1947, I see he gives it a 4 rating, quite good for him. He goes on to say 'Family saga is a bit ponderous at times, but grippingly effective in the end'. I would say that's a pretty fair judgement. Stephen Murray is always good value. Nice to chat, John. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
![]() But you're right, there's still nothing like a good book. It might be worth reading some biographies to get an idea of what you want. Many autobiographies tend to be "look at me, aren't I wonderful" whereas biographies are often more honest and give a wider view. The best one for the time up to the sixties is of course Michael Powell's two volumes of autobiography. He describes much of the British film industry (and touches on some of the European and American industries as well) from inception, when they became a film industry, up to when he stopped working in it in the 1960s. If only there were other autobiographies like those ones ![]() He writes not only about his many successes but about his failures as well. I am always wary of books of reviews like Halliwell's or Quinlan's because although they mean well they often skim too lightly over too many films or people Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
orpheum
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
As to the last question regarding lists of films in release for each year,what about the annuals edited by F>Maurice Speed.I am sure that this series went on well into the sixties.There is also an American series,called something like Screen Parade or Screen Review.No idea when they went on to. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Barry Vaughan
has no status.
Junior Member
|
I'd like to defend Hollywood England rather Alexander Walker, having re-read it quite recently. I think it was written before Walker became too reactionary/grumpy - though it has its moments - and it's an invaluable resource of industry information when, crucially, that information was still fresh in the participants' minds. Plus it is fascinating to read his early 70s perspective on such cherished 60s iconic movies as 'Darling' - he brackets it with the largely-forgotten 'Nothing But The Best' and accords them equal space.
(He doesn't like Ken Russell but so what? Authors need opinions and Russell has always been capable of speaking up for himself.) What is Walker's book on 70s British cinema like? |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
orpheum
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
raylyn
has no status.
Junior Member
|
Have spent a while reading this thread and have ordered a couple of the books mentioned. Can anybody recommend any good biographies of any British actors/directors of 30s - 40s. what I am looking for are biographies that are informative and well written, the content is more important than the subject.
Thanks |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
Available in paperback at Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
penfold
is ready for hibernation
Moderator
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
dpgmel
is booking to see Enjoy
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Last edited by dpgmel; 18-08-2008 at 06:29 AM.. Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
sippog
is . .no, REALLY does have no status
Senior Member
|
I cant find the original post (the search engine here doesn't seem to work with "strings" - less than useful!) but I'd like to thank whoever it was recommended this book.
"Have You Seen . ." by David Thomson is a hefty paperback containing one page articles/reviews of a 1000 films from the old time classics to quite recent stuff. He always seems to have something interesting or perceptive to say and the writing isn't too high-brow. I'm enjoying it. Bought from Amazon for 13 quid (RRP 20). You could do worse for a xmas present, |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Gypsy
is still here
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
moonfleet
is looking for Providence
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I've just read the first one, a great book, even if you didn't know M.P before, if you are a movie fan, it's enough.... also M.P is an inspirated and very good writer, the surprise was also to learn that Luis Bunuel was a cineast he admired... I'm not in a hurry to read the second, because I haven't seen his last films.... Moon.
"Very difficult !" "Craazy!" |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steve Crook
is cheeky
Moderator
|
Quote:
He also admired Walt Disney. He said of Disney: "He was one of the great innovators of film. One of the things I liked was when talkies came in, a lot of the timing of silent films went out of the window and nobody made those marvellous slapstick comedies any more because there were only verbal jokes. But Disney kept on making those wonderful cartoons for at least another ten years so he kept the whole idea of film comedy and narrative through image alive. People don't realize that they owe an enormous lot to him." The second volume of Powell's autobiography is just as well written, but it's not as joyous because a lot of the stories are about great films that didn't get made. Whereas the first volume is about the great films that he did make. But the second volume also tells how the movie industry went from the studio based system run by people who cared about movies as an art form into the more commercial system we have now where it's run by accountants and where there is little or no artistic consideration as to which films get made Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |