![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| Random Film, TV and Radio Talk For loosely-related chat about websites, radio, and bits and pieces unsuited to other forums. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
smudge
is a free man, not a number!
Moderator
|
Quote:
I believe Equity felt strongly enough once to complain about the fact that their members contributions were not being publicly acknowledged if people coudln't read the credits. Don't think they got very far though (obviously). The other week I saw a prog on Five where the preview box had shifted so far across the credits that all you could see were the job titles ! ![]() What also tees me off Aaryk is the number of titles which come out first on BBC America, or even exclusively to that side of the pond. Like you said, we paid for them in the blessed first place ! Cheek. Smudge |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Fareham_Bee
has no status.
Senior Member
|
That annoys me somewhat about the BEEB crying they need more money for digital tele and then showing repeats of programmes we've already paid for, They aren't so bad anymore but they do tend to go in big for the same old junk over and over again on the digital channels.
Sky show adverts but you still have to pay a fee to them (a sort of licence really). Just think of all the money they are making from advertising. Can you tell me they really need subscriptions too? |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Aaryk Noctivagus
has no status.
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I'd be happy if BBC was pay per view if they really didn't want adverts. Frankly the quality of the BBC is so miserable, and the license so high... I couldn't give too hoots if adverts inturrupted their pap. I'd suggest that the BBC became pay per view rather than advert strewn. Then those who wanted to license such a channel could pay for it, rather than anybody owning a TV set paying for it regardless as to whether they watch it or not - or are able to watch certain channels or not. BBC 3 and 4 and News 24 are not available to many license payers regardless of the fact they are funded... and what about the BBC High Definition channel... I'm on cable and I'd have to arrange separately to receive it... probably with an extra charge on top of the license fee. Quality and the BBC have long since parted as enemies. The BBC chases ratings just like the other commercial TV channels (and make no mistake the BBC is commercial big business). They tuck non-commercial programs away... but produce them to excuse their state funding. Its a con. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks | ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie |