Brit Movie

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Senior Member Country: UK DB7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    9,610
    Liked
    151 times
    As I mentioned on an earlier thread I've been concocting a British film timeline (for inclusion in the history bit) from 1930 to present day. Obviously during certain years there were maybe 3 classic films produced but for my purposes I've restricted myself to one.



    The initial draft is listed below so if you'd like to add your two-pennyworth feel free as any views would be appreciated.



    1930: Murder

    1931: The Ghost Train

    1932: Rome Express

    1933: Friday the Thirteenth

    1934: The Scarlet Pimpernel

    1935: The 39 Steps

    1936: Night Mail

    1937: Oh, Mr. Porter!

    1938: The Lady Vanishes

    1939: Goodbye Mr. Chips

    1940: London Can Take It

    1941: 49th Parallel

    1942: In Which We Serve

    1943: The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp

    1944: Henry V

    1945: Brief Encounter

    1946: A Matter of Life and Death

    1947: Brighton Rock

    1948: The Red Shoes

    1949: The Third Man

    1950: The Blue Lamp

    1951: The Lavender Hill Mob

    1952: The Sound Barrier

    1953: The Cruel Sea

    1954: Hobson’s Choice

    1955: The Dam Busters

    1956: Reach for the Sky

    1957: The Bridge on the River Kwai

    1958: Room at the Top

    1959: I’m All Right Jack

    1960: Saturday Night and Sunday Morning

    1961: A Taste of Honey

    1962: Lawrence of Arabia

    1963: Billy Liar

    1964: Zulu

    1965: Darling

    1966: Alfie

    1967: Accident

    1968: If…

    1969: The Italian Job

    1970: Performance

    1971: A Clockwork Orange

    1972: Savage Messiah

    1973: The Wicker Man

    1974: Murder on the Orient Express

    1975: Barry Lyndon

    1976: The Man Who Fell to Earth

    1977: A Bridge Too Far

    1978: Death on the Nile

    1979: Monty Python’s Life of Brian

    1980: The Long Good Friday

    1981: Chariots of Fire

    1982: Gandhi

    1983: Educating Rita

    1984: The Killing Fields

    1985: Brazil

    1986: Mona Lisa

    1987: Wish You Were Here

    1988: A Fish Called Wanda

    1989: Shirley Valentine

    1990: Life Is Sweet

    1991: The Commitments

    1992: The Crying Game

    1993: Naked

    1994: Four Weddings and a Funeral

    1995: Secrets & Lies

    1996: Trainspotting

    1997: The Full Monty

    1998: Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels

    1999: Ratcatcher

    2000: Billy Elliot

    2001: Bridget Jones's Diary

    2002: Bend It Like Beckham

  2. #2
    Senior Member Country: Great Britain
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    617
    Liked
    2 times
    Not much to argue with there. Its difficult to choose one film per year but I'd also nominate:



    1944 A Canterbury Tale

    1950 Seven Days to Noon

    1955 The Ladykillers

    1963 Dr Strangelove

    1964 A Hard Day's Night

    1965 The Ipcress File

    1969 2001

    1969 Women in Love

    1970 Get Carter

    1984 Dance With A Stranger

    1989 Scandal

    1990 The Krays

    1991 Let Him Have It

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    15
    Liked
    0 times
    As per earlier post, it's difficult to argue with most of the choices, but I list my suggestions below for what they are worth :



    1936 Things to come

    1937 Edge of the world

    1939 The stars look down

    1940 Thief of Baghdad

    1942 Went the day well

    1943 Millions like us

    1944 This happy breed

    1945 Dead of night

    1949 Passport to Pimlico

    1952 Importance of being Earnest

    1953 Genevieve

    1955 The Ladykillers

    1956 The Green Man (well I like it !)

    1957 Woman in a dressing gown

    1960 School for soundrels

    1961 Victim

    1963 The Haunting

    1965 The Ipcress File

    1969 2001

    1972 Frenzy

    1988 High Hopes

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    48
    Liked
    0 times
    dylan:



    1989 Scandal

    1990 The Krays




    Sorry but I have to take issue with these two...



    They were dire moments in British cinema history.



    Scandal was a story worth telling but the film that finally emerged from the cutting room had more to do with sea-side postcards than saying anything about the nature of early 60's society and politics.



    Of course it was told from Keeler's side but it failed to explain the magnitude of what happened and instead of a significant exploration of the times, it settled for cheap titillation...I lump it with the dreadful "Lifeforce" as a serious work.



    The Krays was a distasteful subject made even more distasteful by casting two period "glamour boys" - the Kemp brothers from 80's group Spandau Ballet in the title roles.

    The Krays were vicious mobsters not sexy rougues...

    Another bad day for the British fim industry was the day this was realeased.



    Bio-pics can be well made and by the British film industry too..."A Man for All Seasons" is a great film.



    Ken Russell's early works also seem to get underated like Mahler, The Music Lovers and The Devils.



    What about "Jesus Christ Superstar"?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Country: UK DB7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    9,610
    Liked
    151 times
    </div><div class='quotemain'>Polynikes:

    ...I lump it with the dreadful "Lifeforce" as a serious work.[/b]
    Aaahh Lifeforce! A film so bad it's actually watchable in a kitsch b-movie stylee. (well, there's Mathilda May eek! ) There's something wonderfully tacky about Lifeforce and it's forever on satellite or late-night CH4.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    48
    Liked
    0 times
    With all due respect there are oply two reasons to watch Lifeforce and they're shown very early on in full exposure.



    I think I should start a thread on the worst British movies of all time...this would be one.



    Trouble is the Lottery's funding of what's left of the British film industry has resulted in some of the worst creations ever put to celluloid so we could be here all day.



    Generally there were many real stinkers until the 70's. In fact most British films were very well made until the rise of television.



    Crap movies started with the rise of Hammer and continued with the British Sex "Comedies". Robin Askwith has a LOT to answer for!!!

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    48
    Liked
    0 times
    </div><div class='quotemain'>Polynikes:

    With all due respect there are oply two reasons to watch Lifeforce and they're shown very early on in full exposure.



    I think I should start a thread on the worst British movies of all time...this would be one.



    Trouble is the Lottery's funding of what's left of the British film industry has resulted in some of the worst creations ever put to celluloid so we could be here all day.



    Generally there weren't many real stinkers until the 70's. In fact most British films were very well made until the rise of television.



    Crap movies started with the rise of Hammer and continued with the British Sex "Comedies". Robin Askwith has a LOT to answer for!!! [/b]

  8. #8
    Senior Member Country: UK DB7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    9,610
    Liked
    151 times
    </div><div class='quotemain'>Polynikes:

    I think I should start a thread on the worst British movies of all time...this would be one.[/b]
    Rancid Aluminium knocks many supposed 'bad' films into a cocked hat as by the finish you're left wondering just what has been going on for the previous 90 minutes.



    The Lottery has financed countless stinkers and many of them never even obtained a distributor and eventually see the light of day years after production.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Country: Great Britain
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    617
    Liked
    2 times
    Pollynikes:



    I'm not sure I can defend Scandal and The Krays as well as classic films from earlier decades.



    Scandal, in my opinion, a far more important film that the light romantic comedy Shirley Valentine. What made it important was that there was a similar smug, hypocritical political climate in the late 80s as the early 60s and the subsequent decline of the Tories through similar sleaze scandals bears this out. The Establishment hit out at the film for raking over past events but it was championed by serious critics such as the usually puritanical Alexander Walker who considered it "a morality play for today."



    If the Kemp twins came over as "sexy rogues" in The Krays we must have seen different films. The film deliberately avoided glamourising the Krays and concentrated on the tragedy of their madness and pulled no punches in depicting their viciousness.



    ...besides, I like gangster films.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    48
    Liked
    0 times
    dylan:



    Scandal, in my opinion, a far more important film that the light romantic comedy Shirley Valentine. What made it important was that there was a similar smug, hypocritical political climate in the late 80s as the early 60s and the subsequent decline of the Tories through similar sleaze scandals bears this out.



    I grant you that the subject matter of "Scandal" was more significant than "Shirley Valentine" but I think defending its production as a comment on the Tories decline is stretching it somewhat - indeed the Tories were not even at their peak when it was released.

    Perhaps the movie is smptomatic of the 80's but I don't think so...I think it was an excuse to parade Joanne Whalley's buttocks, and Bridget Fonda's and Britt Eckland's breasts rather than a protest against the Thatcher decade.

    The same movie could easily be made today or in the 70's - there was no need to show a sexy naked vampire in "Lifeforce", it was done to get the boys to buy tickets, likewise for "Scandal".



    By contrast, the film "In the Name of the Father" (1994) was a protest film and although as an ex-soldier I think the film is distasteful in its sympathies, it is a far better attempt to dramatise an historical event.



    If the Kemp twins came over as "sexy rogues" in The Krays we must have seen different films. The film deliberately avoided glamourising the Krays and concentrated on the tragedy of their madness and pulled no punches in depicting their viciousness.



    I suppose this is just a personal interpretation....the Kemp brothers were a poor choice to play the Krays because they were sex symbols at the time, the can't act and they're too good looking.

    The scene where they knock out the overbearing corporal during their national service is a particularly good example of almost justifying their violence. Although not quite in the same league, I would draw a parallel with Brian de Parma's AWFUL, empty, tasteless, revolting and mindless "Scarface" with Al Pacino. Although the expletives and bullets fly, he is still sexy Al PACINO going down like Errol Flynn in "They Died With Their Boots On".



    If you want gangster movies, then try a real seedy portrayals like Richard Burton in "Villian" or Michael Caine in "Get Carter" or "Mona Lisa" or Michael Gambon in "The Thief, the Cook, His Wife and Her Lover". Personally, I think you should never like the bad guys....



    ...besides, I like gangster films.



    IMO, the best was going to be "The Long Good Friday" until the producers ruined it by bringing in an IRA angle.

    Bob Hoskins has still produced, IMO, the best British gangster.



    Perhaps someone can help me here but what was the film with Richard Todd trying to get his Ford Anglia back that villian Peter Sellers had stolen? Peter showed he could act a bit in that film.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    48
    Liked
    0 times
    DB7:



    Rancid Aluminium knocks many supposed 'bad' films into a cocked hat as by the finish you're left wondering just what has been going on for the previous 90 minutes.



    It was on cable a while ago here in the USA. I tried to watch it but couldn't...it's unwatchable tripe.



    I saw "Reign of Fire" recently too and that's pretty bad.



    Last week I caught "28 Days Later" in the cinema and quite liked it until the soldiers went mad...I think it would've been better had the director remembered he was making a Sci-Fi movie and not swapped genres into psycho-analysis in the last reel.

    Was it just me but did it also rip off the end of "Resident Evil"?

  12. #12
    Senior Member Country: Great Britain
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    617
    Liked
    2 times
    Polynikes



    <Perhaps someone can help me here but what was the film with Richard Todd trying to get his Ford Anglia back that villian Peter Sellers had stolen? Peter showed he could act a bit in that film.>





    John Guillermin's Never Let Go (1960). Apparently Sellers found a side of himself he didn't like in Meadows the gangster and rarely played straight roles again. Peter showed he could act in quite a few other films too.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    793
    Liked
    0 times
    "NEVER LET GO" 1960 You can buy it now on DVD. Richard Todd plays a great part. Its very well acted for a low budget film. "VILLIAN" 1971 what makes this film a cut above the rest are the characters and dialogue. You can feel Clement & La Frenais hand on the script. Ian McShane's hustler does well next to Burton's psychopath. He was good a year later in "SITTING TARGET" this time teamed up with Oliver Reed. Going back to "THE KRAYS" best summed up as "THE KEMPS" to much faction. "LET HIM HAVE IT" is almost the same. Jim Clark did a mutch better job with his BBC play about the P.C.Miles murder.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Country: Great Britain
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    617
    Liked
    2 times
    Alan Clarke's *To Encourage the Others* about the Craig and Bentley case thankfully still exists on film and was recently shown at the NFT.



    I recall that it caused some controversy back in 1972 as did much of Clarke's work.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    48
    Liked
    0 times
    What I liked about "Villian" was Richard Burton's willingness to show a the crook as the deep, dark, nasty animal that they usually are.



    Contrast that to the bad guys in say "3000 Miles to Graceland" or John Travolta in "Broken Arrow" or "Swordfish" - always willing to indulge in some designer shooting but not really scary.



    Burton's character is one you would genuinely fear running into in an East End pub. The guy who played "Bricktop" in Guy Ritchie's "Snatch" is another.



    For sheer acting a tough bad guy, I'd like to nominate Robert Carlyle as "frank" in "Trainspotting".

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    48
    Liked
    0 times
    dylan:



    John Guillermin's Never Let Go (1960). Apparently Sellers found a side of himself he didn't like in Meadows the gangster and rarely played straight roles again. Peter showed he could act in quite a few other films too.



    I can't think of any other Peter Sellers straight roles to be honest...it must be great acting on both parts because ordinarily you wouldn't think Richard "Dambusters" Todd would have much trouble with Peter "the Goon" Sellers.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Country: Great Britain
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    617
    Liked
    2 times
    Those fortunates who have seen The Blockhouse (1973)claim that it contains one of Sellers' finest performances as one of a number of Frenchmen trapped in a fortification during WW2.



    Legal difficulties between the producers are given has the reason it wasn't shown in the cinemas or on TV.



    Anyone here seen it?

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    793
    Liked
    0 times
    Ian McShane said he watched "VILLIAN" in a New York cinema. For some reason,unknown to him,they had dubbed every actors voice with a Bronx accent except Burton.

    As for the actor who played Bricktop, Alan Ford, he was in another good British gangster movie "THE SQUEEZE" 1977. Leon Griffiths wrote it, he of "MINDER" fame and "THE GRISSOM GANG". Stacy Keach came over to star. And stayed a little longer then he wanted.

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    48
    Liked
    0 times
    HACKETT:



    Ian McShane said he watched "VILLIAN" in a New York cinema. For some reason,unknown to him,they had dubbed every actors voice with a Bronx accent except Burton.



    Americans are very insular people. Most do not have passports and little experience of the world...the British (and Dutch, Germans etc) all have widespread knowledge of the USA and culture through TV, cinema and travel. An American by contrast will struggle in Britain to even understand regional accents.



    American producers and distributors (being completely commerically driven) will go out of their way to "Americanize" film & TV as they genuinely fear that unless the average American (of which they have a very poor view of) relates and accepts and understands the product in front of them, they will walk out.



    Hence British films are as American as possible (usually with American leads or at least a British lead who is recognised by Americans).



    A British accent is dubbed.

    A British TV series like Eastenders is only shown on minority interest channels.

    A foriegn film is dubbed into (American) English rather than subtitled - I saw "Brotherhood of the Wolf" and "La Reine Margot" in English.

    An Emma Thomson film was given CGI treatment to airbrush out her armpit hair as the distributors didn't want to offend American audiences (and hence lose ticket sales).

    British TV comedy series have "canned" laughter imposed on them - BBC America also does this to the Blackadder - something I have complained to them over.



    "Bend it Like Beckham" was an exception and the distributors actually retained the title.



    As for the actor who played Bricktop, Alan Ford, he was in another good British gangster movie "THE SQUEEZE" 1977. Leon Griffiths wrote it, he of "MINDER" fame and "THE GRISSOM GANG". Stacy Keach came over to star. And stayed a little longer then he wanted.



    The Squeeze was a rather nasty British gangset film...but again, why was an American actor asked to don a British accent?

    I don't remember Alan Ford being in it but I also can't remember the last time I saw it.



    I like the grit of British gangster movies....the 2 Sweeney films also had it.

    Guy Ritchies 2 films has it in buckets...is anyone aware of plans for him to make a third gangset movie?

    There were all kind of rumours of a movie on the recent Attempted Gem Heist at the Millenium Dome.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-10-10, 01:18 AM
  2. british film
    By sashamax in forum Can You Name This Film
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 27-05-10, 10:49 PM
  3. What makes a british film British
    By AlevelFilm in forum Media Studies
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 13-03-10, 12:01 PM
  4. British film-goers don't like British films...
    By DB7 in forum British Films and Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 24-11-09, 01:59 PM
  5. British Film
    By lau in forum Media Studies
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 13-11-07, 10:23 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts