Nice to see there are others who dislike this film.
Always thought it was just me. As the reactionary right wing Nazi that I am, I cannot stand Oh What A Lovely War either.
Well look what they did with the term "The Thin Red Line" which was actually another action in the same battlefield on the same day
Steve
Nice to see there are others who dislike this film.
Always thought it was just me. As the reactionary right wing Nazi that I am, I cannot stand Oh What A Lovely War either.
Oh dear.
I think Richardson's interest in attacking early Victorian imperialist military blunderings was less than you might imagine. His satirical aim was quite clearly set on contemporary targets, not least Vietnam. And upon a post-Imperial fantasy that even now lingers in the hearts of too many of my compatriots.
It is part of an anti-war, anti-establishment, sub-genre that includes MASH and Catch 22. And, yes, Oh, What a Lovely War!
There's a lot of background information regarding the film here
Oh What A lovely War ! is different it does come from a more earthy working class tradition and works better on the stage. It may have lofty ambitions and touch on grand themes but works best in the claustophobia of theatre with a small cast.
I do like the film it has a couple of wonderful set pieces and some lovely cameoes and touches and I think it was unfairly slated but do think the it works best in a more intimate setting or as a radio play.
It's strange how A Bridge Too Far can be thought of as one of the most accurate portrayals of any event in wartime and at the same time be thought of as an anti-war film. I suppose that all you have to do to put most people off the idea of war is to show them what it's like
Steve