Quote:
Originally Posted by Third Man
Agree with everything you say - I did get a slight hint of grievance from yourself with the Connery character Roberts, I myself think he's not that worthy of admiration rather of a person sitting on the fence to see which way the wind blows, perhaps I'm looking too deeply.
Simon
|
You're right, he wasn't worthy of admiration - and he knew it. He was in jail for assaulting a senior officer who had commanded him to take his men into a battle which Roberts considered a waste of his mens' lives. On first consideration that might have seemed a noble thing to do, but in reality, soldiers know that is beyond the pale. They also know that a senior NCO guilty of that crime is finished. There is no way back from a Courts Marshall conviction for disobeying an officer and striking him. Until 1919 he would have been shot. That makes his position in the prison impossible. Jock McGrath (Jack Watson) summed it up when they were being lined-up for the first time. His dislike of Roberts would have been echoed throughout the prison, and anyone associating with him would have suffered similar isolation from the main body of the prison. Roberts had nothing to lose, and even the RSM wouldn't have bothered to try and change his attitude.
I think you are right to look deeply. There are many dark examples of military life which are accepted by the serving soldier in his world that are depicted in this film. It illustrates the difference between ordinary and military society very well. I doubt it could be replicated today as most of the people involved with the film would have had some experience, first or secondhand, of National Service at least, and also a good proportion of the audiences in the 1960s.
Sorry, I've run on a bit there - as usual!
Still a great movie as a social commentary though.
Regards, HG