![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Notices | ![]() |
| Your Favourite British Films Name your favourite British film or make a case for an underrated classic. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
|
DB7
has no status.
Administrator
|
Must-have movies: Dead Man's Shoes (2004)
(Filed: 01/09/2006) Marc Lee reviews a classic that every film-lover will want to own As a filmmaker, Shane Meadows is as rooted in his home territory as, say, Woody Allen is in New York or M Night Shyamalan in Philadelphia. And if Matlock, Derbyshire doesn't seem quite as promising or exotic a setting, his extraordinarily powerful and coolly lyrical Dead Man's Shoes places it on the cinematic map as firmly as the Big Apple or the City of Brotherly Love. It's a tale that takes frequent ugly turns, but the views are beautiful throughout. Meadows's fourth full-length feature was shot in just three weeks on a low budget; key casting decisions were made only days before filming got underway; and the script was in a constant state of flux. Yet it is as confident and satisfying a movie as this country has produced this century. In addition to the accomplished cinematography, which also weaves in unnervingly fidgety hand-held sequences, Dead Man's Shoes shines with a narrative that bowls along through terrible revelation and appalling violence to a devastating denouement. There is also a twist as effective as Shyamalan's best. However, the film is unmissable mainly because of a towering central performance from Britain's best actor. Paddy Considine, who co-wrote the script with Meadows, plays Richard, a former soldier who returns home to wreak revenge on a bunch of local low-lifes – drug abusers, petty criminals – who, eight years earlier, tormented his younger brother Anthony (Toby Kebbell, superb). He terrorises the gang in a similar manner, gradually turning these tough nuts into gibbering bundles of nerves who, in the end, are afraid even to visit the lavatory alone. Considine brings an astonishing intensity to the role, blending quiet malevolence with fraternal gentleness. Even if he is motivated partly by guilt at having failed Anthony, his righteousness makes him utterly invincible. There is a leavening of humour – Richard dons a gas mask to transform himself into a nightmarish "elephant man" and later plasters the gang leader's face with clownish make-up while he sleeps – but Dead Man's Shoes, with its bursts of highly imaginative nastiness and brutality, is not for the faint-hearted. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Azanti
is in post production
Senior Member
|
I have met Shane on a number of ocasions, in fact him and I began working virtually in the same week in the business and I know why he choose to make this film the way he did, after his experience with the disappointing Once Upon A Time In The Midlands which clearly was not a good experience.
I think on balance the film is fresh and orginal with some very strong performances. I can see why it falls into a 'love or hate it' category - It is that type of film and has that type of quirkyness. I am glad to see Shane's career continue to flourish because I am sure in years ahead he will make some surefire masterpieces, and he could have easily, as a persona, gone the other way, but he is still very humble about his luck and his work. As for comparing him to Shyalaman or however you spell it - I am sure but in my view he was a total one hit wonder. I worked out the ending of 'The Village' from just watching the trailer and unbreakable and Signs were just 'so what' films for me, though I am sure others may herald his work. Just because a film has a twist in it (Not exactly new) it doesn't make it comparable to someone else. The two of them aren't even remarkably similar in talent or ability. Shane is leagues above him. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
dogstar
is wondering when he last said boo to a goose
Senior Member
|
Clearly the Shayamalan reference wasn't intended to suggest a comparison between him and Meadows as film-makers in any way. The original review quoted in the above post merely compared the plot twist in Dead Men's Shoes to those in Shayamalan's films ( for what its worth I'm in the Moor Larkin camp on this one ).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Azanti
is in post production
Senior Member
|
lol, for what its worth, I'm not.
Having lived on council estates on the outskirts of Nottingham, I can totally verify that some (empahsis on some) gangs of youths selling drugs are actually are not much more than a bunch of bullying hapless incompetants who try and talk to the talk but can't walk the walk if someone of any real calbre stands up to them. The film really doesn't take certain elements of itself too seriously, the whole gang being in a 2CV is a pretty definite statement of intentions on that one. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
harryshand
is still searching
Member
|
Absolute class - imho this is Shane Meadows finest - I didn't believe the hype from friends and colleagues for ages but eventually bought it and wished I hadn't waited so long.
There are a few small holes in the plot I suppose, but the characterisation is superb - I didn't see the twist coming and I think a few of the deleted scenes would have been better left in. The full (deleted) parmesan cheese improv scene is hilarious, the gangs actions shocking and the ending is touching. A top 5 all timer for me |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Tags | ![]() |
| dead man's shoes, shane meadows |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
|
Copyright © 1998-2009 BritMovie |