The Dam Busters - Page 9 - Britmovie - British Film Forum

Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum Britmovie - British Film Forum
Home Page Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

 »   Britmovie - British Film Forum » Cinema » Your Favourite British Films

Notices

Your Favourite British Films Name your favourite British film or make a case for an underrated classic.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2007, 01:47 PM
Moor Larkin is passing the time
Senior Member
 
Moor Larkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North West Frontier
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,686
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cooleyn View Post
I've joined this forum to express my sheer delight
What a super Post......

Moor Larkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 01:52 PM
Automotivehistorian has no status.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The New Forest
Posts: 175
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

The story of the Lancs that were used, piloted by Lincoln crews, is interesting in itself.
Automotivehistorian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 01:56 PM
orpheum has no status.
Senior Member
 
orpheum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,466
Country:
iTrader: (6)
Default

If anyone wants to see a real Lanc there is one on exhibition down the road from me at the Raf museum in Hendon.

Welcome To Highbury The Home Of Football
orpheum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 02:24 PM
Aaryk Noctivagus has no status.
Senior Member
 
Aaryk Noctivagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: -
Posts: 1,428
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by penfold View Post
It might also be only 196 pages because he was dead at 24....
Or they could have used very small type!!!
Aaryk Noctivagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 02:25 PM
Aaryk Noctivagus has no status.
Senior Member
 
Aaryk Noctivagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: -
Posts: 1,428
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moor Larkin View Post


Age 22 (at the time)

327 pages
Big type. Very big letters, but small words
Aaryk Noctivagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 02:28 PM
Aaryk Noctivagus has no status.
Senior Member
 
Aaryk Noctivagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: -
Posts: 1,428
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cooleyn View Post
I've joined this forum to express my sheer delight at finally seeing my all-time favourite war movie - The Dam Busters - on the big screen...
Great post, Cooleyn and welcome to the Forum
Aaryk Noctivagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 02:48 PM
John Hodson is sky west and crooked
Member
 
John Hodson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bolton, Lancashire
Posts: 97
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cooleyn View Post
I've joined this forum to express my sheer delight at finally seeing my all-time favourite war movie - The Dam Busters - on the big screen again last night at Cineworld in Aberdeen, an event which was - to the amazement of the management - packed to capacity.

Having watched it repeatedly since I was a child, the experience of seeing (and hearing) it up there was like seeing it for the first time. Being in the second row, the effect of seeing REAL Lancasters thundering towards the screen at genuinely low level was simply awesome, and the sound of those Merlin engines through a cinema sound system was incredible.

Interesting point to make, though . . . .

The cinema was mostly full of youngsters, and I had expected them to denigrade the movie and perhaps snigger (HEY! A new and politically-correct name for Gibson's dog, perhaps?) at a lot of it, especially the special effects - but not a bit of it.

These young people - many who obviously had never seen the film before, laughed at the parts that we may have forgotten were amusing ("my 'ens lay premature eggs that fall off the perch and mess up the floor") and were genuinely awed by the sight and sounds.

What really struck me, however, was their reaction during the classic scene near the end, when the camera silently pans through the empty rooms of the missing aircrews - you could have heard a pin drop in the cinema.

Another interesting fact was that the Lancasters cavorting at low level over the lakes in the movie were obviously real and were obviously REALLY flying that low. There is no amount of cgi (am I wrong?) that could replicate such an incredible sight, especially when the bombers filled the screen and almost flew right out of it.

So, I say praise God that such an awesome, powerful, poignant, magnificent movie masterpiece was once again shown where it truly belongs - on the big screen, and thanks also to all those youngsters in the cinema in Aberdeen, who showed respect for a legend and who, I really believe, became fans of the movie too.
That experience was replicated at Bolton too; a full cinema, a good sprinkling of teenagers (including my 15 years old), no stupidity and dead silence at that moment you point out cooleyn. Wonderful.

About 30 years ago, my brother-in-law, then in the RAF, invited me to watch as the new Station Commander took the Battle of Britain's Flight's Lancaster up for a spin. Watching it take off and being flung about the skies was one thing, but then having it come barreling in over one of the hangers at probably 80-100 feet above my head was quite another. It's a sound the film couldn't hope to replicate!

filmjournal.net/john
John Hodson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 03:56 PM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,776
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hodson View Post
It's a sound the film couldn't hope to replicate!
There have been attempts to include subsonics or even seat vibrations in cinemas. But they went the same way as ideas like Smell-O-Vision

Anyway, subsonics can be dangerous. They can loosen the bowels and have other effects on some people

Steve
Steve Crook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 04:38 PM
Aaryk Noctivagus has no status.
Senior Member
 
Aaryk Noctivagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: -
Posts: 1,428
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Crook View Post
Anyway, subsonics can be dangerous. They can loosen the bowels and have other effects on some people...
lol - Spoken like somebody who doesn't watch 'Mythbusters' on cable
Aaryk Noctivagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 04:58 PM
Steve Crook is cheeky
Moderator
 
Steve Crook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,776
My Mood:
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaryk Noctivagus View Post
lol - Spoken like somebody who doesn't watch 'Mythbusters' on cable
I would say more like "spoken like a scientist and engineer who watches it quite often and finds it entertaining, but far from rigorous - they don't always get it right"

I said "They can ... on some people", not that they always do for all people

Steve
Steve Crook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 05:07 PM
Aaryk Noctivagus has no status.
Senior Member
 
Aaryk Noctivagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: -
Posts: 1,428
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Crook View Post
I would say more like "spoken like a scientist and engineer who watches it quite often and finds it entertaining, but far from rigorous...
Have you investigated this rigorously as a Scientist and Engineer then?

I'm only aware of the 'Mythbusters' investigation... it may not be rigorous, but as far as I am aware, its all we have to go on (pun intended). I may well be wrong... and will be happy to be shown my error.

Scientists and Engineers often get it wrong also... History is littered with examples.

Last edited by Aaryk Noctivagus; 05-09-2007 at 05:11 PM..
Aaryk Noctivagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 05:29 PM
NappieB has no status.
Senior Member
 
NappieB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 350
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaryk Noctivagus View Post

Scientists and Engineers often get it wrong also... History is littered with examples.
Thank God Barnes Wallis wasn't one of them!

I started my adult working career as a research chemist, fresh out of University. That was a long time ago and I've had several career changes since then, but my scientific training has at least taught me to be both sceptical and very careful when forming conclusions or making judgments.

"The future is yet to come" - George W. Bush
NappieB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 05:53 PM
christoph404 has no status.
Moderator
 
christoph404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London central
Posts: 1,667
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moor Larkin View Post
What a super Post......
hear hear....a great illustration of how a film from that era can still captivate and find a new audience, and no CGI, just real flying sequences with real Lancasters, brilliantly done. I think the flying sequences in 633 squadron are pretty good too and even in The blue Max. What makes them good is that they are done for real. I love films about flying and love those types of films and the reason I was dissapointed with a contemporary film like "The Aviator" was the sheer unreality of the CGI flying sequences.
christoph404 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 06:18 PM
Aaryk Noctivagus has no status.
Senior Member
 
Aaryk Noctivagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: -
Posts: 1,428
Country:
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NappieB View Post
...but my scientific training has at least taught me to be both sceptical and very careful when forming conclusions or making judgments.
Good for you
Aaryk Noctivagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2007, 03:00 PM
Freddy has no status.
Senior Member
 
Freddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Irish Sea
Posts: 1,957
Country:
iTrader: (1)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moor Larkin View Post
I'm sure I watched a version the other week where everyone called the dog 'Boy', just as Patrick McGoohan did. It seemed to work quite well and made a modicum of sense.

How odd that they should leave the dog as
-. * .. * --. * --. * . * .-.
but change the code-word.........

I wonder how many versions are out there? They could do a boxed set of all the variations........

If this is the same version was the ending changed as well? The original has Richard Todd walking a small way and then turning right into a building to write the letters. But in this one they let him walk straight on into the distance. I seem to remember him actually saying in an interview that that was the only thing in the original he would have changed. It seems that the backroom boys carried out his wish.

regards

Freddy
Freddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
michael anderson, the dam busters


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:02 AM.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1998-2008 BritMovie