It isn't my logic, Richard. The film was an American production - so, by the industry definition, it was an American film.
If you want to argue that a Brit subject and locations, actors and so on, make it British (or part British) then that's up to you. That would mean that Disney's Mary Poppins was part Britsh; Errol Flynn's Robin Hood.
Where do you stop? Does one Brit actor make it a Brit movie? or two? British director? What about Hitchcock's films in Hollywood?
British subject matter? How about the old Charge of the Light Brigade - shot in Hollywood, but it has a British subject and several cast members...
As I said, the film industry looks at where the money came from. The Elephant Man is an American production because it was entirely funded by American companies - Mel Brooks produced. If you want to call it a British film for other reasons, that's up to you.
But the reason it doesn't feature on any industry lists as one of the best British films, is because officially it isn't.
It does work the other way around too: Captain Apache (1971) is a British film (Spanish co-prod) despite having three American stars, director, setting, subject matter and being filmed entirely not in Britain!![]()



Reply With Quote
